Download now: Cannabis Cash

Clean or Dirty, Coal is Dead

Written by Keith Kohl
Posted October 12, 2016

Amidst the political punches, finger pointing, and general mudslinging hurled back and forth in the last presidential debate, there was a moment that captured my attention.

You might remember it.

Donning his glorious red sweater, Ken Bone singlehandedly showed me how delusional desperate politicians can become with an election just four weeks away. His simple question for the two candidates was how their policies would strive to meet energy demands while still protecting the environment and preventing job loss in the fossil fuel industry. 

And that's when Trump dropped a bombshell of a line: “Coal will last for a thousand years in this country.”

My ears immediately pricked up the moment Trump uttered these words. I practically did a double-take in my own living room after hearing it, and my jaw nearly hit the floor.


Don’t get me wrong; both sides of the aisle have their own fantasies regarding energy policy.

But the suggestion that the coal industry will reign for a thousands years? There’s really only one response to that...

Laugh. Laugh hard. The kind of gut-wrenching, deep-throated guffaw that makes you forget what you were talking about at the time.

The only thing more ludicrous than that was what he said right before it... and the sooner you recognize it, the sooner you’ll understand who’s going to win our energy race.

“A Thing Called Clean Coal”

“There is a thing called clean coal,” Trump pointed out before his 1,000-year remark.

Okay, you and I both know there’s no such thing as clean coal. The term itself was a result of political propaganda in the 1980s to make the industry seem more popular.

What Trump was referring to was carbon-capture technology (CCS) used to collect carbon-dioxide emissions from a coal plant. The captured CO2 could then be used for things like enhanced oil recovery — an idea that we’ve talked about for years, actually.

I’ve told you from the outset that our transition away from coal wouldn’t be an overnight phenomenon, but could take decades to occur.

Now, nearly a decade later, there’s absolutely no question that the coal industry is in an irreversible death spiral... but it’s not thanks to delayed, over-budgeted CCS projects, or even the usual suspects like solar, wind, or any other environmental uproar.

The blame lies squarely on natural gas.

The Death of the Coal Industry

When I said death spiral, I wasn’t kidding.

And the numbers are about as ugly as you’ll ever see...

The industry as a whole has lost more than 90% of its market value over the last five years. Coal production has plummeted right alongside prices. Since 2011, the United States’ operating coal-fired generating capacity has dropped by 15%.

But again, we saw this coming, didn’t we?

After all, coal accounted nearly 60% of the United States’ electrical generation during the late 1980s. By 2011, the industry’s share had declined, yet still supplied roughly 42% of our electrical generation.


But like I just said, we can assign nearly all of the blame for coal’s demise on the resurgence of natural gas. The shale gas boom is the sole reason the U.S. is producing more natural gas than ever before.


And things are getting worse for the coal industry, not better.

The entire industry is on the ropes, and it’s time to accept the fact that nobody — no, not even Trump — can resurrect the sector.

Last year, coal only accounted for 16% of the United States’ total energy consumption, about 91% of which was used for electrical generation. This demand was a sharp 12% decline over 2014.

You know what happened just as well as I do...

Record production led to a supply glut, which in turn caused the low commodity price environment that we find ourselves in today.

Of course, it was production growth in one play in particular — the Marcellus Shale — that not only lifted U.S. natural gas output, but also disguised the decline in conventional production. Now, natural gas makes up more than one-third of the United States’ electrical generation.

In the coming weeks, we’ll be taking a look at both Clinton and Trump’s energy plans in more detail.

More importantly, I’ll show you exactly how to ride the energy bridge away from coal... clean or not.

Until next time,

Keith Kohl Signature

Keith Kohl

follow basic@KeithKohl1 on Twitter

A true insider in the technology and energy markets, Keith’s research has helped everyday investors capitalize from the rapid adoption of new technology trends and energy transitions. Keith connects with hundreds of thousands of readers as the Managing Editor of Energy & Capital, as well as the investment director of Angel Publishing's Energy Investor and Technology and Opportunity.

For nearly two decades, Keith has been providing in-depth coverage of the hottest investment trends before they go mainstream — from the shale oil and gas boom in the United States to the red-hot EV revolution currently underway. Keith and his readers have banked hundreds of winning trades on the 5G rollout and on key advancements in robotics and AI technology.

Keith’s keen trading acumen and investment research also extend all the way into the complex biotech sector, where he and his readers take advantage of the newest and most groundbreaking medical therapies being developed by nearly 1,000 biotech companies. His network includes hundreds of experts, from M.D.s and Ph.D.s to lab scientists grinding out the latest medical technology and treatments. You can join his vast investment community and target the most profitable biotech stocks in Keith’s Topline Trader advisory newsletter.

Hydrogen Fuel Cells: The Downfall of Tesla?