Views: 5938
Text:

Peak Oil Deniers Remain Oblivious

Even The U.S. Military is Sounding The Alarm

By Keith Kohl
Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Despite the rush of warnings this year, peak oil deniers are still ignoring the signs.

You know them. They're the ones sitting in the corner, their tin foil hats neatly perched atop their head as they plan out their next tirade. Their whining is always ridiculous, often making outlandish assumptions and citing wild sources.

Take last week, for an example. I was told that all the world's oil problems would be solved if the U.S. only opened up ANWR.

Regardless of how you feel about opening up ANWR, do you honestly believe it's the solution to the peak oil crisis?

Like I said, most of their rantings are absurdly articulated.

And when my colleague, Nick Hodge, laid out some simple oil facts, there were still a few of these folks to come out of the woodworks. Believe me, dear reader, peak oil deniers don't hold anything back. And oddly enough, their caps locks buttons always seem to be broken.

At some point, the naysayers and conspiracy theorists will have to come to terms with their peak oil denial. I only wish that I'm in the same room when that happens.

Advertisement

Beat Big Pharma to the Profits on A Breakthrough That's Bigger Than Penicillin

Right under the nose of the drug giants, this small American company has developed the genetic key to eradicating the world's deadliest diseases -- influenza, malaria, HIV, and many of the major killer cancers...

Get in on this tiny stock before news of their breakthrough "cell-shock" technology gets out -- and your chance at 1000 times your money is gone forever.


U.S. Military Cries Peak Oil

The U.S. military makes up 80% of our government's total energy consumption. Two years ago, the DoD's budget was $20 billion... and that number is still only a fraction of what many believe to be the military's real energy costs.

Here are a few more interesting statistics to consider, taken from a report on energy security by The Pew Project :

  • 70% of the tonnage the Army delievers to a battlefield is fuel- and water-related.

  • Delivering fuel to a forward area can cost up to hundreds of dollars per gallon, sometimes as high as $400 per gallon. Refueling jets in the air can cost between two and 20 times the price at your local pump.

  • On average, every $10 change in the per-barrel price of oil means $1.3 billion in additional DoD energy costs. Think about that the next time you see oil prices climb from $33 per barrel to $80 per barrel in less than a year.

Recently, the Department of Defense released a report warning us about the upcoming peak oil crisis. You can imagine how much they're concerned over a global oil shortage.

The report echoed my own sentiment that $100/bbl oil is right around the corner.

Yet the DoD went on to state that surplus oil production capacity could disappear within two years and severe shortage with five years.

Energy and Capital readers might see a familiar statistic buried on page 24 of the DoD report:

By the 2030s, demand is estimated to be nearly 50% greater than today. To meet that demand... the world would need to add roughly the equivalent of Saudi Arabia's current energy production every seven years.

It gets even better, too...

The central problem for the coming decade will not be a lack of petroleum reserves, but rather a shortage of drilling platforms, engineers and refining capacity. Even were a concerted effort begun today to repair the shortage, it would be ten years before production could catch up with expected demand.

Although I'm not as optimistic as the U.S. military report that production will ever reach that high, we can at least get an idea of how serious the situation is. In fact, I believe the world will be hard-pressed to reach 90 million barrels per day, let alone the ridiculous amount of 118 million barrels per day.

Making up a shortfall of 10 million barrels per day will not be as easy as opening up some oil and gas leases in federal waters. No matter how much President Obama would like to appease the "drill, baby, drill," crowd, it simply won't have a significant impact on production.

Furthermore, by the time the shortage occurs, I can't help but wonder whether the Saudis will be there for us.

Shunned by the Saudis

The fact is that Saudi oil imports to the U.S. is declining.

See for yourself:

Saudi oil imports april 22

Notice that our Saudi imports peaked in May, 2003 at 2.3 million barrels per day. As the second largest oil producer (and OPEC's largest producer), are the Saudis giving us the cold shoulder?

That could certainly be the case. Oil from the middle east isn't exactly a popular topic these days.

So where are they shipping their oil, if it's not to us?

China.

This week, Saudi Arabia announced it will increase oil exports to China by 125,000 barrels per day. It's a burgeoning relationship. Saudi Arabia makes up 20% of both China and India's oil imports. During the next ten years, Chinese oil imports could nearly double, from 5.1 million barrels per day to 9.4 million barrels per day.

And without Saudi oil, things will get even tighter for the U.S. Military.

Taking Peak Oil Profits

So where does that leave us?

The answer seems obvious to us, doesn't it?

Ramping up domestic production and Canadian production could be the only chance we have. Canada is currently our largest source of oil imports, and lately their oil industry has been booming.

I might not have to remind you of that part. Investors have been taking peak oil profits for years, and there's no reason to stop now. In fact, the opportunities are still out there for the smart investor. One stock alone has raked in more than 1340% within the last 12 months.

Until next time,

keith kohl

Keith Kohl

Energy and Capital

P.S. I've had the pleasure of reading the Department of Defense's report, and if you're interested in looking it over, you can download it here.


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (16 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Mark Goldes on 2010-04-22
Although not yet widely believed by scientists, water can replace oil as fuel.

Future cars will become substantial power plants when suitably parked, ending any need to build coal or nuclear plants - demonstrating far less expensive alternatives to all fossil fuels. Eventually cars and trucks might pay for themselves.

See Moving Beyond Oil and Running on Water at: www.aesopinstitute.org

To learn more about water as fuel, visit the website of parallel technology developer, BlackLight Power.

Scientists understandably have a hard time accepting fractional Hydrogen, the basis of this new energy.

More laboratories need to repeat the fractional Hydrogen experiments at Rowan University, also successfully performed by GEN3 Partners, who advise Fortune 100 firms.

As technology using water as fuel is demonstrated and reaches the market, it will become increasingly difficult to ridicule, ignore or deny.

Following the Pearl Harbor attack, within a few months a bomber rolled off an assembly line every 59 minutes.

These new technologies are much simpler and inherently cost-competitive.

Comment by jaggedben on 2010-04-22
LOL

I wonder how the peak oil deniers will feel about being lumped in with Mr. Goldes here. I'm a little surprised all these guys can answer the comment verification question correctly. ;-)

Kieth, one thing you can say for sure...you're bringing peak oil to a mainstream audience!
Comment by John on 2010-04-23
Hey Keith, try doing a little research next time. The peak oil Chicken Littles have been crying wolf too many times over the past 100 years for any thinking person to believe in it. Yawn.
Comment by Harry on 2010-04-23
Are you serious Mark Goldes?

Are you actually serious?

I can't believe it.

I can't believe you escaped your mental institution.

How did you do it?

..Grow up.
Comment by DRH on 2010-04-23
"This week, Saudi Arabia announced it will increase oil exports to the U.S. by 125,000 barrels per day. It's a burgeoning relationship." Did you mean "China" when mentioning the burgeoning relationship? Also, the spelling and grammatical errors damage the credibility of the article, though I totally agree with it. Naysayers would pick up on this probably to make some other foolish point.
Comment by grupa Jurgena on 2010-04-23
Who said that 2010 to 2030 we will reap so much oil.
20210 Europe announces new energy to electric cars - germany.

2013 World starts production of electric cars.

2014 begins with a slow shift away from oil to electric vehicles.

Need for 10 years in the automotive world savings of 50% oil

The entire industry is undergoing a global project Leonardo da Vinci is known the energy of the Future
2030 75% of the world of limited oil

U.S. oil fields is a strategic future

Group Forecasts Jurgen Germany
Comment by MR on 2010-04-23
Are the Peak Oil Deniers in the same boat as the Peak Natural Gas Deniers? Instead of looking to Canada and others to feed your bad habit of over-consumption, why not try harder to kick the habit. Shouldn't a Department of Defense be at home defending instead of the opposite?