More Profitable than Big Oil
Taking Advantage of Big Oil's Buying Frenzy
Most of us have fallen for the allure of Big Oil before, starstruck by companies like ExxonMobil.
Unfortunately, things are getting bad out there for the supermajors...
For starters, they're being shut out.
Fifty years ago, they had access to more than 85% world's oil reserves. Back in the 60s, National Oil Companies (NOCs) barely held on to the rest. Since then, the situation has completely flip-flopped.
Today, NOCs now hold more than almost 95% of global oil reserves.
You'd probably expect ExxonMobil — the world's largest publicly-traded oil and gas company — to be somewhere near the top...
Sadly, the company doesn't even crack the top 10:
Big Oil in Big Trouble
Let's take a closer look at Exxon.
Last year, the company's brass boasted about having replaced 209% of production. They were even quicker to mention how the company is leading the industry in reserve replacement.
As with most things, the devil is in the details:
The corporation’s reserves additions in 2010, the highest since the merger of Exxon and Mobil, reflect strategic acquisitions, new developments, as well as revisions and extensions of existing fields resulting from drilling, studies and analysis of reservoir performance.
Did you catch that?
Without making huge acquisitions, these supermajors will soon be in serious trouble.
Remember, the company paid $40 billion in a deal to buy XTO Energy, which added 2.8 billion boe to their proved reserve base.
ExxonMobil isn't alone, either:
Last November, Chevron paid $4.6 billion for Atlas Energy, a major player in the Marcellus shale.
In just the first quarter of 2011, Total S.A. spent approximately $4.46 billion in acquisitions.
Royal Dutch Shell spent nearly the same amount for their own Marcellus acquisition, buying East Resources.
And it's not just Big Oil that's buying up the world's remaining oil and gas reserves. The NOCs, particularly from China, have been on a buying frenzy as of late.
They're certainly willing to spend the cash — whether it's the billion they throw at Chesapeake for a 33% stake in their operations, PetroChina's $5.4 billion bid for a part of Encana's gas and shale assets, or even Sinopec's $4.54 billion deal for ConocoPhillips' 9% stake in Syncrude, the largest producer in the Canadian oil sands...
The problem is countries now realize how valuable their oil and gas assets have become.
After a share swap deal between BP and Rosneft collapsed a few days earlier, Putin mentioned that Royal Dutch Shell is a “comfortable partner” to develop their Arctic oil and gas reserves.
I can't help but wonder if Shell feels the same way.
Back in 2006, Shell was basically forced to cede its controlling stake of its Sakhalin-2 operations — and that's putting things nicely.
It only took months of regulatory problems issued by Putin. Gazprom took control after dishing out $7.45 billion to Shell.
Of course, in Venezuela's case, they didn't even bother with the red tape. The May Day takeover ousted them in one fell swoop. So far, it hasn't worked out well for Chavez, who's facing an energy crisis of his own...
Let the Orphans and Widows Fight for Scraps
There are reasons companies like ExxonMobil are considered widow-and-orphan stocks.
They can draw a good deal of attention from name recognition alone, that's for sure. ExxonMobil has a market cap topping $400 billion and is operating all over the world.
But perhaps we're being too hard on the big guys. We'll certainly give them credit for continually raising their dividends, despite the massive crash in oil and gas prices during 2008:
Despite that small consolation, we know there's a better way to invest in energy.
Two years ago, when we said that our money is better spent elsewhere, we weren't kidding.
In fact just a few weeks later, we talked about several other oil and gas opportunities — including a basket of up-and-coming North Dakota drillers.
How did the world's largest oil companies perform compared to the smaller Bakken plays? As you can see, it wasn't even close...
I'll let you decide whether I'm treating the supermajors unfairly...
Now imagine how much that gap stands to widen over the coming years, as NOCs continue squeezing Big Oil out of their projects.
That's why companies like ExxonMobil will be shelling out top dollar for small energy firms drilling in the right place — or in this case, the single largest natural gas field in the United States.
Until next time,
Editor, Energy and Capital
Energy Demand will Increase 58% Over the Next 25 Years
After getting your report, you’ll begin receiving the Energy and Capital e-Letter, delivered to your inbox daily.