Offshore Oil Drilling

Pulling the Plug on Offshore Oil

By
Monday, April 20th, 2009

There's one thing that gives me pause on my way to work. . .

Sitting across the street is a building that has captured my attention each and every morning for the last three years. And no matter what kind of hurry I'm in, I absolutely have to take a moment to stop and admire it.

Built back in the 1940s, it's a landmark for anyone in the area. You can instantly tell it was made with care. From a distance it looks like a massive castle, turrets and all.

But as you get closer, you can see how well every nook and cranny was delicately carved out with purpose. The detail is simply amazing. And although I find some new aspect to admire whenever I walk by, I've never had the opportunity to go inside it. . . until today.

I found myself in a similar situation when I stopped to look at it early this morning. The dark clouds weren't enough of a warning, and a torrential downpour came down in a heartbeat. I quickly took refuge from the rain at the entrance and came face-to-face with the building's doorman.

Not wanting to waste an opportunity to ask, finally, whether the interior was just as stunning, I struck up a conversation with him.

Looking back, I wish I hadn't asked.

According to him, the building has deteriorated quite a bit. The plumbing was a disaster, and there was always something wrong with the pipes. For him, it felt like the walls were crumbling. During the last few years, the price to repair everything has been extremely costly.

No matter what they replace, something else falls apart.

I think some of you will be able to see a striking similarity my building has with our oil industry. . .

It's not just the oil fields that are aging; let's not discount the growing number of rigs and miles of pipelines that need to be maintained. Of course, the fact that oil prices have drastically fallen over the last 10 months doesn't give me much comfort that those expensive ventures can even be afforded.

The times, dear reader, they are a-changing.

The Energy Bull You Don't Want to Miss

Our analysts have traveled the world over, dedicated to finding the best and most profitable investments in the global energy markets. All you have to do to join our Energy and Capital investment community is sign up for the newsletter below. You'll also get our free report, Oil Outlook: Investing in 2011 by our resident energy expert, Keith Kohl.

Enter your email:
We never spam! View our Privacy Policy

Ten Billion Barrels Busted

When the IEA released their 2008 energy report, there were some disturbing facts that came out. One problem, specifically, is how vital a handful of fields are to our global production.

Over a quarter of the world's oil production came from just 20 giant oilfields. Don't forget that most of these fields are more than 50 years old and in decline. Overall, a little more than one hundred fields make up half of the world's total production (the remaining production is made up of approximately 70,000 oilfields).

As production at those super giant fields wanes, we're going to have to rely more on smaller fields to make up the difference. One would conclude that it's important to continue developing new areas for exploration.

Apparently that's not the case.

Last week, a federal court of appeals tossed out the Department of the Interior's 2007-2012 five-year oil and natural gas leasing plan, citing concern for the environmental impact.

My longtime readers might remember when I talked about the Department of Interior's lease plan back in 2007. As I recall, they expected their plan to generate $170 billion dollars from developing oil targets off the coasts of Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.

Well, so much for that plan.

As you probably expected, the decision is being both hailed and condemned.

So let me ask you, "Do you think the move was justified?" Please feel free to let us know how you feel about the situation by leaving a comment below. I don't expect my readers to pull any punches on the court's decision.

The Future of Offshore Drilling

What this does mean, however, is that preventing development in these offshore waters will have a detrimental affect on our future production.

Although the effect on longterm prices is still to be determined, I wouldn't expect it to sway current oil prices. Actual production from these lease areas wouldn't have been pumped for several years.

There's another reason I'm not too worried. As I just mentioned, offshore production is playing an increasingly important part in global production. While the giant onshore fields age and decline, we're going to have to drill further and deeper than ever before—simply to make up lost production.

Like the rest of the oil industry, lower oil prices have had an effect on the offshore drillers. They certainly weren't spared the volatility. At the height of $147/bbl oil, day-rates for new contracts could reach up to half a million dollars. We can also add fewer available contracts on top of the declining day-rates.

Here's the thing. . .

Even with the court's decision to put the kibosh on the DOI's offshore lease plan, I'm still banking on the offshore drillers to pull through, especially over the next few years.

I'm not suggesting you blindly throw your hard earned money at any company, praying you hit the big one. I could just as easily torch my cash. As I've said to my readers before, hopes and dreams don't pay the bills.

Instead, I would focus my attention on which of those offshore companies have a strong fleet under contract. How much of their drilling fleet is sitting idle? Which ones have a backlog of work?

Don't think for a second that there's no money to be made in today's markets. For example, I know that most of my readers recently banked a solid 30% gain from just one of these beaten down offshore drillers.

More importantly, however, is that they're a few days away from making another move. It's not fair to my newer readers if I didn't offer you the same chance. Maybe it's time you joined their success.

Until next time,

keith kohl

Keith Kohl

Energy and Capital


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (23 votes)




Comments:

Comment by Bob on 2009-04-20
Best get your walking shoes out! Alternatley, buy a horse. Oh wait, he would eat hay and fart, green, but still making green house gas!
What are we to do?
Perhaps a better solution, fire every one inside the Washington beltway, lawyers and all! Now theres an idea!!
Comment by George Moe on 2009-04-20
By restricting the drilling leases and the current low prices for oil and gas, we are being set up for shortages out one or two years. Expect $200.00 oil.
Comment by Daniel A. Vann on 2009-04-20
I'll admit it - i'm very biased. I live and work in OK where oil and gas play a vital role in our econonmy.
That being said, my feelings are best expressed by a quote from your article:
"preventing development in these offshore waters will have a detrimental affect on our future production."
Maybe there isn't too much here to cause major angst, but it begs the question: does this administration have any real clue about a 'comprehensive energy plan' for the future? From my perspective, i'm guessing not.
Comment by Tim Miller on 2009-04-20
The US government seems to be unconcerned about the national security issue caused by our massive oil imports from the Middle East and other countries (like Venezuela) that don't really like us very much.

Too many people believe that there is a low cost alternative to oil and that we don't even need it anymore.

In 10-15 years we will remember the good ole days when oil was only $150/Bbl





Comment by Steve Fay on 2009-04-20
Sounds like the court was short sighted and politically biased. What a big surprise!!
Comment by David J. French on 2009-04-20
David French writes:

I say: "Leave it in the ground!" It would be better for us to learn earlier how to get along without the present apparently unlimited supplies oil (i.e. while they exceed demand), than to discover every possible field and pump madly until we've used the very last drop.

Oh, many people would get rich in that scenario. And the governor of Alaska would be pleased to see her good citizens employed, for a time.
Comment by Richard on 2009-04-20
I don't understand the attitude. The Gulf of Mexico has been raked by Katrina, Rita, Ike, etc. recently and no oil spills even as rigs are moved 100's of miles from their placements and pipelines become as tangled as spagehtti.

Old sunken rigs become the best fishing spots. What's not to like?
Comment by Mike Petersen on 2009-04-20
Spending money and energy to prop up our oil addiction by drilling in hard to get to places like the deep ocean is short sighted. We spend far too much moving people around in large private automobiles, when we should be investing in fast mass transit and efficient electric motors. Its a supply and demand question and we need to cut demand.
Comment by Jeremy on 2009-04-20
Yea, I don't mind the government taking back the leases. Oil companies have a history of cutting corners when it comes to environmental safety, and with the low oil prices of today, I'm sure they'd be more temped than ever to cut corners. Besides, it's not like we can't release these areas 10 years from now. Let's save that oil for when we really need it, and for when oil prices are much higher, which they are sure to be in the future whether we allow drilling off shore right now or not.

On another note, I really like this newsletter, but I wish every article didn't end with you guys bragging about your latest "winning trade" while trying to get people to join your service. How come you never talk about your losing trades? Oh, that wouldn't make good publicity, would it?
Comment by Robert Nichols on 2009-04-20
I think it is a disgrace that the minority group of dimwit environmentlists are controlling and destroying the country. Why do we let minority groups run the country? It is stupid!

We should be drilling everywhere we think there is worthwhile oil, offshore, on shore (anywhere!), in Alaska, and on the White House lawn if it is a worthwhile site.
I grew up with wood heat, kerosene lamps, no running water, just 2 bedrooms and a path on a small farm. We killed a pig every year..that was our cooking oil,and most of the meat we ate..we had a chicken a few times in a year. We lived on potatoes, corn, and other vegetables we grew...ground the corn and made corn bread..we had biscuits for breakfast with oatmeal and milk gravy.
I DO NOT want to go back to that!
The events and direction of the Govt. is pointing in just that direction. In fact, Experts are predicting that we will be a third world country before the present administration is through..if it ever is...I expect it to turn into a dictatorship.

The USA as we have known it for my 78 years is a goner...Maybe I can survive for a few more...I'll be putting out a garden, canning and freezing food...Maybe I'll have electricity to keep the freezer going. I only have natural gas heat...If that goes, or the dollar becomes worthless and I can't pay for it, I guess I'll just freeze to death.
Have a good day! I may be the last one...soon anyway.
Comment by roger egg lestone on 2009-04-20
the greens will destroy the country..no jobs,,alt energy will not supply the us needs
Comment by Lionel Predmore on 2009-04-20
Drill we must if survive we will.
Oil is our prime source of energy. When other forms become econonmic they will take their rightful place in our cafe of choices. To artificially force oil's price to increase by ignoring its presence raises everybody's costs and places the USA at the mercy of a world market, instead of a major player in that market. It forces us to fight battles we need not. Innovation rises out of need, not stupidity.
Comment by Lew Hodge on 2009-04-20
Keith:
Nice piece as usual and INFORMATIVE.
We are paying a price for the fact that our leaders, legislators and judges in particular, do not have any training in running the nation, or any of the affairs of government. They are just lawyers who can't make it in private enterprise. They are particularly lacking when any scientific item is on the table, as is the case with oil. The poor, stupid judge (in the oil drilling piece) doesn't even have a thieving lobbyist to consult.
An elemental fact is that, in the absence of oil, the earth can support about a billion and a half humans. This is only about one quarter of our current world population. Three quarters of the population, lacking oil or suffering with severe shortages, will need to find another place to live, or die off. Now that IS an environmental concern. Mistakes made by idiotic leaders (the judge in your article) will exacerbate the hopelessly critical time constraints we face in trying to replace oil with something (anything) else. Mankind has wasted so much time, time that should have been spent developing the infinite or semi infinite sources of energy (i.e. fusion, deuterium). Instead we have contented ourselves with the fission reaction, threatening our enemies with atom bombs. Mankind missed it's most critical window of opportunity ever.
The extreme poverty ahead, at Obama's hand, may partially solve the problem and relatively early. I predict that Americans, and citizens of other first world nations, who have lived on top of the world's heap all their lives, will not put up with living in a crumbled society. That lifestyle, with its attendant horrors, will precipitate widespread suicides, nationally and worldwide.
If Bernard Madoff, after experiencing the Brooklyn Detention Center, could get back into his 7 mil apartment for just a few minutes, do you think he'd jump off the balcony?
Lew
Comment by John on 2009-04-20
Why waste time and energy drilling for 1 or 2% of oil in Alaska.Spend the $ on alternative means.It takes alot more than 2 years to bring any drilling to market.Fusion has a real chance with some serious research.
Americans need to wake up and an be more pragmatic with regards to living and greed....
Comment by JimBo on 2009-04-21
Who would have believed in July 2008, oil would go down to $30, yet it did, and dramatically. What does this say once demand shows any jitters to awaken, oil will skyrocket. In almost every way production has been drastically cut back and waiting for prices to climb. This could lead to a time bomb of inadequate supplies fueling a nightmarish back lash for oil demand, spiraling prices higher and higher as the highest bidders, including China seek any way to out do the other bidders. High times my friends, for those in theoil business, if this current lack of production and lack of new drilling is not abated.
Comment by Ivan Hills on 2009-04-21
Sometimes courts are incredibly stupid. Or was the law itself absurd? Remember phlogiston? The new Ice Age (30 years ago)? Freudian psycho-analysis? Witchcraft? UFOs? 5-5-2000?
Comment by Kenneth E. Stahl on 2009-04-21
I have plans for an electric motorcycle with a cab. With the "encouraging" IEA reports and our own DOI, I had better get busy!!
Comment by Bob S on 2009-04-21
Keith,
I believe this country needs to re-establish its perspective of "wants" vs "musts". While the Feds try to re-kindle the economic fires here with copious amounts of fake money, the fuel it takes to run this machine is left where it resides - in the ground. Makes no sense! Who do we see about that?
Comment by Chuck Surprise on 2009-04-21
It's encouraging that someone finally had the intelligence and power to derail the Bush/Cheney DBD (Drill Baby Drill) Express. Our pastures and shorelines are cluttered with rigs, our highways are jammed with poison-spewing internal combustion monsters, and our lungs are choked with particles and coated with smoke. It's time for greener motive power...and there's PROFIT in it as well.Green, afterall, is the color of our money.
Comment by Peter Teasdale on 2009-04-22
Americans need to wake up and an be more pragmatic with regards to living and greed.... A quote from above, how true. There are just too many people already, so drilling for even more oil, releasing it's trapped CO2 and reducing our long term carrying capacity even further is ludicrous. Prepare to adjust your standards of living NOW or prepare to die.
Comment by Dorv on 2009-04-27
We are a nation led by some of the most stupid and selfish politicians, lawyers and judges one can imagine. No scientific understanding at all. The environmental movement was and continues to be designed to establish government control over private property and the productive class in America. And the lazy pols go right along with the enviro people capitalizing on the envy of the parasite class. (you can read it in some of these responses) They will bring down our economy one way or another while sitting on trillions of dollars of wealth under our feet. We must understand that liberal fascism (read the book) requires redistribution of our wealth while at the same time producing no new wealth. The laws have been written to easily prevent nuclear power which, if allowed, would make us all wealthier. But that will never happen as long as the liberal fascists prefer us begging to them. The Pogobama crowd is leading us to disaster.
Comment by Dorv on 2009-04-27
We are a nation led by some of the most stupid and selfish politicians, lawyers and judges one can imagine. No scientific understanding at all. The environmental movement was and continues to be designed to establish government control over private property and the productive class in America. And the lazy pols go right along with the enviro people capitalizing on the envy of the parasite class. (you can read it in some of these responses) They will bring down our economy one way or another while sitting on trillions of dollars of wealth under our feet. We must understand that liberal fascism (read the book) requires redistribution of our wealth while at the same time producing no new wealth. The laws have been written to easily prevent nuclear power which, if allowed, would make us all wealthier. But that will never happen as long as the liberal fascists prefer us begging to them. The Pogobama crowd is leading us to disaster.
SHARE / RATE