Views: 2107
Text:

Senate to Lay the Smack Down on Oil Companies

The Future is Murky for Offshore Drillers

By Brian Hicks
Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

After what seems like an eternity of bad news, BP finally announced yesterday that it had something good to share with the world...

A containment cap recently attached to the sunken Deepwater Horizon well that’s been spewing 1 million gallons of oil per day into the Gulf of Mexico is actually capturing a portion of the runaway crude.

Time to break out the party hats?

Well a portion is, of course, better than none — which is what BP was stopping up until yesterday.

Advertisement

The Smart Grid: A Smart Investment

It's being called “the biggest investment of the next 50 years” by the CEO of GE.

The likes of Cisco and Bank of America are also on the edge of their seats, anticipating the boom of smart grid technology.

In fact a Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) analyst recently said they expect 80-140 million meters to be installed in the next 10 years — and a total smart grid investment of $215 billion in the next four to five years.

This is going to be huge.

The time to invest in smart grid technology is now — and we have all the details of how you can get in on pure plays in this report.


However, the consensus seems to be that this spill won’t be fully contained until the fall… which means hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil will continue to gush into the water for the rest of the summer, killing wildlife and industry alike.

So while a couple of high fives may have been exchanged at BP headquarters yesterday, they’re hardly deserved.

Besides, this capping isn’t even the biggest story in the oil industry today...

In fact it’s a potential UNCAPPING that’s got petro barons talking.

You see, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has announced that he’s planning to move comprehensive energy legislation up to July’s docket. He’s also requesting that Senate chairmen come up with recommendations on direct legislation dealing with the Gulf spill.

“I think it is extremely important that you each examine what could be included in a comprehensive energy bill that would address the unfolding disaster in the Gulf of Mexico,” Reid said in a recent letter to the Senate chairmen.

And what might that legislation include?

Up until now, oil companies have only been liable for up to $75 million in damages when it comes to oil spills. Consider that the estimated cost of BP’s blunder is set to reach as much as $14 billion, and I’m sure you can see the writing on the wall.

Reid is pushing to uncap that liability limit and force BP to pony up the dough for their accident.

"Among the actions I think we need to explore are ensuring that the oil companies are held accountable for their actions and the damages caused by their operations,” he states in his letter.

Given the absolute horror show that the Deepwater spill has become — and the onslaught of negative publicity anything associated with offshore drilling has been hit with — it’s very likely that Reid will have the public’s support on this one.

After all, BP is getting away with paying a paltry $75 million. (For the same amount, an MLB team can buy a slightly above-average ball player for only about five years.)

It seems absolutely criminal in the eyes of the public, and anyone who voted against them having to pay far more than that for their mess would be vilified beyond belief.

If the legislation passes, and no matter how much BP ends up paying, one thing is for certain…

Oil companies are going to think long and hard about how important offshore drilling truly is to them these days.

Plain and simple: Does the risk outweigh the reward?

Do petro firms wants to drill 35,000 feet into the ocean for black gold when the potential cost of an accident is completely on their shoulders? Tens of billions of dollars at stake if a single thing goes wrong…

At least in the short term, the threat of new legislation like could serve to spook oil companies from setting foot back in the water. The potential for a PR and financial nightmare is just too great right now.

Bad news for our oil supplies, no doubt… but great news for inland oil reserves who will see focus swung squarely around to them in the meantime.

Reserves like North Dakota’s Bakken formation, which you’ve read so much about in the pages of Energy and Capital.

The Bakken region is so far estimated to hold over 4 billion barrels of untapped oil… but that figure could now be as high as 9 billion with the discovery of the Three Forks/Sanish zone underneath the Bakken shale.

Big firms like Hess are already involved there. But it’s the smaller oil companies that are really going to make their mark here — and make their shareholders some big profits.

Just a couple weeks ago, Brigham Exploration Co. — an independent oil exploration firm from Texas — saw their share price shoot up 11% in a single day, thanks to positive well results from their Bakken properties.

The BP spill is only going to produce more stories like these over the next few months.

President Obama has put at least a 6-month freeze on new offshore drilling permits, so we’re looking at a minimum of half a year’s worth of major activity in the inland oil market...

As always, we'll keep you up to date on the latest hot zone in domestic energy production as it develops.

You’ll want to keep your eyes peeled in the next couple of weeks for a brand-new report we’re putting the finishing touches on right now. This report will detail 3 small American drillers all with big prospects in the Bakken region.

The U.S. Government is practically putting a mile-high fence up around its waters right now and daring oil companies to be so bold as to even think about hopping it to drill again.

It’s not a dare I believe they’ll take — not while the threat of uncapped liability is staring them straight in the eye.

Their only solution is to move inland and take their chances there. And you better believe those drills will be flocking to North Dakota very soon.

So check back with us soon for your free report giving you complete details on what your next move should be in this new oil landscape of ours.

To your wealth,

Brian Hicks
Publisher, Energy and Capital

Advertisement

The Smart Grid: A Smart Investment

It's being called “the biggest investment of the next 50 years” by the CEO of GE.

The likes of Cisco and Bank of America are also on the edge of their seats, anticipating the boom of smart grid technology.

In fact a Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) analyst recently said they expect 80-140 million meters to be installed in the next 10 years — and a total smart grid investment of $215 billion in the next four to five years.

This is going to be huge.

The time to invest in smart grid technology is now — and we have all the details of how you can get in on pure plays in this report.



Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (2 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by John E Fraser on 2010-06-08
This article I find to be very interesting and I agree with most of it. However, there is an issue that has me completely confused. As I understand what happened in the Gulf. (1) BP drilled the well using inferior drill pipe. There was an option to use stronger pipe.
(2) BP capped the well with a blow-out valve that was inferior. They had the option of using heavier protection. Is this assumption correct? If so where was the regulatory power? Who was responsible for saying "You want to drill in the Gulf at those depths? Then this is what you will use. Now we have legislators beating the drums all over the world proposing restrictions on the drilling of oil off-shore. This to me is a knee-jerk reaction. I believe BP went cheap because they could get away with it and now the world must pay for it through contamination. Am I right in my analysis?
Comment by Tom on 2010-06-08
What about companies such as Wavefront Technologies who have a system with pulsating injections that are starting to recover up to 40-60% more oil from abandoned or low flowing oil wells. I think this is the immediate future for North and South America where only 20% of the existing oil is only recovered. The oil is there, why are we not seriously doing anything about it?
Comment by Don Sparlin on 2010-06-08
Brian,
Note that every fix attempted by BP involves collecting oil in a waiting tanker. It seems to me that they could have crimped the pipe and vastly reduced the oil leakage while waiting for the relief wells to be completed. Instead they made a grab for short term profits at the expense of PR and future fines. Shareholders before stakeholders. This will turn out to be a very bad decision.

Regards, and I enjoy your publications.
Comment by Earl F. Bihlmeyer on 2010-06-08
I am glad to hear that the President has placed a moratorium on offshore drilling. However, I still have two concerns. One is that I have information that says drilling offshore, and in the Gulf, is continuing despite the President's moratorium. The position being taken, I am told, is that ongoing drilling is work associated with approvals already received. I would have thought that the President meant STOP! EVERYONE! NOW!!

My second concern is, what is being done with existing, operating wells, and wells in the process of drilling or just about to begin drilling, to prevent similar disasters to the one created by BP?

Should the President declare Marshall Law in the Gulf and send the navy in to enforce his moratorium?

Are there resources available, and competent, to perform inspections and safety reviews on existing wells? Is anyone watching the new drilling and the "all ready approved" drilling so that, in their haste to get wells operating, the oil companies will not cut corners and give us another disaster?
Comment by Earl Bihlmeyer on 2010-06-08
Does anyone really believe that the Senate will be successful in gaining control over Big Oil? Doesn't Big Oil already have significant influence on the whole Congress assure continuing with business as usual? Is Big Oil still being subsidized? Who authorizes that? Will the same people really put the Smack Down on Oil Companies? And, by the way,the experts are moving toward the opinion that the Gulf is dead. Will this become the justification for continued drilling?