U.S. Investment in Renewable Energy

How Washington's Stupidity Can Make You Rich

By
Friday, August 22nd, 2008

Over the past few months, the renewable energy industry has struggled to maintain investor confidence as Congress continued to drop the ball on the renewable energy production and investment tax credits.

They're set to expire at the end of the year. And if that happens, renewable energy stocks are sure to fall.

Now before you draft your hostile e-mails about how renewables should be able to compete without subsidies, I call your attention to the billions in subsidies the oil industry receives every single year.

I can assure you, NO form of energy generation exists without some form of subsidies.

And if you don't believe it, take a look at this 2007 article written by my colleague, Chris Nelder. It spells out the whole dirty secret that no one in Washington wants to admit about fossil fuel subsidies.

U.S. Renewable Energy Tax Credits...by way of Stupidity!

Last Saturday, Nancy Pelosi signaled her willingness to consider opening more coastal areas to oil exploration. If this happens, it could certainly enable a bipartisan effort to get those tax credits extended through a long-awaited compromise.

Now don't get me wrong. Opening up offshore drilling is a bad joke with an even worse punch line.

If we started drilling today, we'd have a very small flow of new oil coming online in about a decade. This would be well after the global peak of production, and provide little relief to the average Joe trying to get a tank full of gas.

Of course, some have suggested that had we just done this ten years ago, we'd have all that lovely oil flowing right now. And that's true.

Though, in another few years, we'd be right back where we started — sitting here with our thumbs in our mouths, trying to figure out how to fill up our SUVs with rhetoric and fairy dust.

Meanwhile, the dolts in Washington continue to blatantly lie in an effort to placate the voters just a little longer.

Take a look at what House Minority Leader John Boehner said in response to Pelosi's announcement about the Democrats' willingness to consider offshore oil exploration:

"Our message to Speaker Pelosi is very simple: We are ready to vote on more energy production and lower gas prices right now, and we should not wait one more day to begin giving the American people the relief they expect and deserve. If you meant what you said last night, we welcome you and your Democratic colleagues to join us in our historic call to action on American energy."

Historic call to action? Really?

Well, I guess history is filled with "historic calls to action" that ultimately led to disaster. So they won't be the first.

Either way, this latest news does lend a bit more confidence to the possibility that the production and investment tax credits will be extended. At this point, it's really a matter of whether or not these bureaucratic parasites decide to actually get some work done when they come back, or spend their time campaigning... slinging mud on our dime.

It'll probably be a little of both.

Though, as we saw over the past couple of weeks, with or without those tax credits, renewable energy momentum is not slowing down.

Renewable Energy Investment, without Hesitation

Last Thursday, Pacific Gas & Electric (PGE) announced that it had signed contracts to buy 800 megawatts from two solar power plants that will be built near the Central California coast. Combined, these plants will produce enough power for about 240,000 homes.

The companies that landed these deals?

SunPower Corporation (NASDAQ:SPWR) and Optisolar.

This project is the largest single photovoltaic commitment from an electric utility in the world, according to the Solar Electric Power Association.

The SunPower project will begin power delivery in 2010, and the Optisolar project, which is twice as big in terms of megawatts, is expected to begin power delivery in 2011.

Not surprisingly, SunPower soared on the news, picking up as much as 22% by the next day.

Google's Impact on Renewable Energy

This past Tuesday, Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) announced that it was investing $10.25 million in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). The funding is going to...

· Seattle-based AltaRock Energy Inc. to develop technologies that will enable cost reductions and improved performance in EGS projects.

· Redwood City-based Potter Drilling, Inc. to develop new approaches to lower the cost and expand the range of deep hard rock drilling, which is critical to large-scale deployment of EGS.

· Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab to update geothermal mapping in North America.

No publicly-traded companies involved here. Though if you're looking for a geothermal play, your safest bet would be with Ormat Technologies (NYSE:ORA). Or, if you're looking for more bang for your buck, check out U.S. Geothermal (AMEX:HTM). It's an up and comer that's actually generating megawatts and money right now.

Also on Tuesday, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg outlined his proposal for more renewable energy in New York City. The Mayor wants to build offshore wind farms, small-scale wind installations and tidal power systems to supply no less than 10 percent of the city's electricity needs.

According to aides, the mayor has recently met with T. Boone Pickens to discuss how wind power could be used in New York City. And certainly you've seen what T. Boone's done for the wind industry in just the past month. Not to mention the money investors are making off of his transitional energy stocks.

On Wednesday, Suntech Power (NYSE:STP) announced that its sales and profit climbed significantly in the second quarter.

Sales rose more than 50 percent from a year ago, and profit rose to $64.9 million for the quarter, compared to $41.7 million a year prior. The company also raised its 2008 revenue forecast to a range of $2.05 billion to $2.15 billion from a range of $1.9 billion to $2.1 billion.

The stock ended the day with a 12.4% gain.

Still, STP wasn't the biggest solar winner that day.

No, the biggest winner was Solarfun Power Holdings (NASDAQ:SOLF).

Incidentally, this is a stock that Alternative Energy Speculator editor Nick Hodge recommended about five months ago when it was trading around $9.40. By Thursday, the stock hit $21.26 a share

That's a gain of more than a 126% - in just five months!

If you'd like to see Nick's latest pick, which is actually a company that's making money hand over fist thanks to T. Boone Pickens and his Pickens Plan, click here now.

To a new way of life, my friends. And a new generation of wealth...

jeff signature

Jeff

 


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (18 votes)




Comments:

Comment by Paul Killinger on 2008-08-23
Of course, you neglected to mention that unlike virtually every company in the renewable energy sector, the oil industry also pays a FORTUNE in taxes.
Comment by Rich on 2008-08-23
I keep hearing "10 years to go on line..." for oil production in ANWR or off shore. This is without foundation. I've been in the oil/gas business for 29 years and production could begin within 2-3 years.
Comment by Dave Jorgensen on 2008-08-23
It's too bad that Boone Picken's wind energy company isn't a public company so that we could all profit along with him. I hope you realize that all this hoopla he is advertising is for his own interests as well as for the interests of the country.
Comment by Guy L. Rocca Jr. on 2008-08-23
Oil could be online from ANWR and offshore in less than 5 years.

Get your facts straight and not from the green idiots!

Comment by Banish Taylor on 2008-08-23
Oh Yea! Wind and solar receive more than 50% of their construction costs in Federal subsisities. Wind electricity receives 1.5 cents/Kw to help make it competitve with conventional sources. And it cannot be stored so you have to have conventional on stand by!And remember the California school district that went to Wind Energy to save money. Well, their electric bill increased $20,000.00 over the prior years conventional- no savings and over budget.Its no panacea!And when the wind doesn't blow or blows too fast- what then??
Comment by Ivan Hills on 2008-08-24
I get opposing impressions from your two reports--E. & C. and $20 trillion. Sure,let's have 'alternatives' but if Clinton had not vetoed the Republican Energy Bill 12 yeears ago oil would be flowing from offshore before now. Oil is more than fuel. It is feed-stock for plastics galore. That may be more important than gasoline. Therefore potential North American oil sources should be explored. Yes, we need to get off foreign oil & NG for strategic reasons (think Georgia's pipeline) Boone-Pickens is okay on NG development but he'll have to battle the greens on distribution. Global-warming is cod's-wallop. It exists only in computer-modeling. As an old physicist friend of mine at S.R.I. said:"Garbage in! Garbage out!" He used three main-frames, too. By-the-way, global-cooling is the real danger.Especially in Maine where we should be drilling for NG.
Comment by Kalil Abi-raad on 2008-08-24
I received a good laugh at Mr. Siegel's latest leftist comments. According to him, as Americans we should put our faith in a socialistic democratic government that has never been able to solve any problem that Americans have; Perfect social democrat left wing elitists thinking.
Comment by The Pastor on 2008-08-25
As nice as it would be to generate electric power from wind and solar (good idea) - it is not going to help oil demand. Very little electricity is generated by oil.
To say drilling will not help is ludicris - our legislators stick their heads in the sand and think that will help??? No single solution is an immediate answer - but DUH!! - don't just stand there - do something. Whatever we add to our own production will help.
Maybe if we put sails on the tops of our cars - all the hot air from Washington will propel them and save on fuel.
An oil company makes record profits because it is a big company - but percentage wise the profits are much lower than most other businesses. Why doesn't the media report the amount of investment it takes to keep those oil companies going - and as another comment to this article - how much in taxes they paid after generating that income.

Stop the cry-baby routine and pointing fingers - get together and work on the overall problem.
Romans 8:18
Comment by jim flynn on 2008-08-25
This guy does not know what he talking about. If we opened up offhsore and shale, we would see additional prodcution within 12-24 months.
I am in Texas, we know a lot about offshore oil production.
Saying you are not going to try to drill more in the US because it will take too long is like saying you not going to save for retirement.
Idiots. We need to drill, and, have alternatives, AND conservation.
Comment by wayne woodson on 2008-08-25
Jeff

You didn't mention the ridiculous cost to build these solar plants. Without the renewable energy tax credits, these projects will not proceed. No one knows what the maintenance bill will be for these things but I'll bet very high, and their service life is a big question mark. There is some quick money to be made, but long term I have my doubts.
SHARE / RATE