Rate:
Share
Views: 3858
Text Size:

China's Green Investment

The World's Biggest Polluter Looking for Green Profits

By Christian A. DeHaemer
Friday, October 23rd, 2009

China has a big problem.

Anyone who has been to Beijing, or watched the 2008 Olympic Games, knows that China suffers under a large, black cloud of soot and smog.

On August 27, 2008, China officially became the world's largest polluter. On that day, they churned more CO2 out of their coal-fired electric plants than the United States.

Advertisement

The Locked-Down Lithium Play

China controls 95% of the world's lithium mines.

This One company is about to exploit them for massive gains.

One investor has already made $1 billion.

Click here to get in now.


The Middle Kingdom suffers from a dearth of oil, but has abundant coal supply. For this reason, they use coal for just about everything. . . and given the 10% annual growth in GDP, its use is expanding rapidly.

A recent report from Canada says that China's greenhouse gas emissions have increased 120% this decade.

The Climate Bugbear

Now, I'm not writing to you about saving the environment. I believe that "climate change" is to the Democrats what "terrorism" is to the Republicans. To paraphrase H.L. Menkin, it's a bugbear used to frighten the public. It gives the politicians something to save us from.

So, it's no wonder that China has been fighting international environmental agreements for years. The country would not only rant about western imperialism, but argue correctly that while it contains twenty percent of the world's population, its greenhouse gas emissions per capita have remained less than other industrial countries'.

It seems only natural that the world's fastest growing, highest pollution-producing country would continue on its path of anti-environmentalism. . .

This is why I was so shocked to read that China recently:

  • Held meetings in New York with 200 green scientists,
  • Is pushing green energy going into a meeting with President Obama next month, and
  • Has just signed an emission reduction agreement with India.

. . . And all this ahead of the international meeting on the environment at Copenhagen in a month and a half.

According to the Wall Street Journal, "Asia's two biggest polluters from burning carbon-based fuels announced their collaboration on renewable power and energy-efficiency projects in a memo of understanding yesterday in New Delhi."

What the heck is going on?

One would like to think that China has had a bout of conscience, perhaps in response to a recent report that claimed birth defects in China's coal regions rose 40% between 2001 and 2006.

According to China Daily, "The number of newborns with birth defects is constantly increasing in both urban and rural areas. Environmentalists say that the leading culprit is China's dependence on coal and that birth defects are highest in coal-producing regions such as Shanxi province and Inner Mongolia."

Follow the Money. . .

I'd like to think that China is motivated by ethics, but I doubt it. Rule number one of investing is to follow the money. When a country like China suddenly switches its rhetoric to encompass environmentalism, there is a reason. . .

Green energy is where the money is. The richest man in China (worth $5.1 billion), plans to take over the world by selling electric cars to the masses, and the second richest person made her $4.9 billion fortune recycling paper.

In fact, China's green industry is now estimated to be worth $132 billion.

Wan Benti, chief engineer with the Ministry of Environmental Protection in China, claims "the total output value of 1,300 Chinese enterprises in the environmental protection industry will hit 900 billion yuan by the end of this year."

China is already the world's largest producer of solar panels, and is becoming a front runner in the battery and power storage sector. Note the surge in Hong Kong High Power Technologies:

HPJ Chart

I suspect that China's newfound environmental crusade has less to do with CO2 emissions and more to do with profit.

If the rest of the world wants to hamstring its leading industries by throwing up more barriers — in terms of carbon restrictions, cap-and-trade, etc. — China is more than happy to sell electric cars and solar panels to consumers in the West.

And if GE sells fewer turbines and GM fewer cars, that's alright, too. . . just don't expect China to follow any agreement it signs.

In the end, it's just more of the same Chinese duplicity.

I do know one thing: all of these Chinese green energy companies can be expected to surge going into the Copenhagen meetings. I'll send you my best idea next week — it's a cutting-edge battery maker that could easily go up 1000%.

Sincerely,

Christian DeHaemer

Energy and Capital

P.S. At this stage in the recession, I would dare any trader to match the success that my colleague, Ian Cooper, has been having lately. After all, how many people do you know trading with a 94.2% success rate? While most traders are running away as fast as they can, Ian simply rolls up his sleeves and gets to work. Recently, he's knocked out a 20% gain in two days — and another 58% trade in a little over a week. But hey, don't take my word for it. . . I want you to grab these profits for yourself. Just click here to learn more.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (10 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Doug on 2009-10-23
"H. L. Mencken"
Comment by CarolAnn on 2009-10-23
is not worth reading. I will delet anything from this writer in the future.

Comment by Benton Bain on 2009-10-23
CO2 is NOT a pollutant!!! CO2 is needed for the existence of plants as Oxygen is to animals. All historical records show that when the CO2 is the highest you have the most vegetative growth. This is proven in all modern greenhouse that inject CO2 into them properly that you will get 40% or more production.
Comment by joe on 2009-10-23
Pollution definitely causes birth defects but co2 does not. Best not to mislead readers by implying that co2 is pollution. China needs to get its toxins under control. co2 will only serve to make the place greener.
Comment by Herbert W. Nickel on 2009-10-23
Excellent article! Keep up the good work!
Comment by Bill on 2009-10-23
I have appreciated much of E&C stuff because it is consistent with my own ideas of energy and resource exhaustion and the equally urgent need to reign in our excesses before we end up getting buried alive in our own waste. But this piece is inconsistent and absurd.. I mean "climate change is to democrats what terrorism is to republicans". So you equate lighting off a couple of unwinable wars to secure oil supplies with greentec which would ween America off foreign oil and totally revitalize the home economy? Oh sorry! According to you those diabolically clever Chinese are going to get the jump on greentech sell it to us dumbos tied up in carbon credits.. I guess the democrats are stupid for thinking like the Chinese - who as we all know don't know how to think in the longer term.

How about this. China is shifting green because it (as always) is playing a long term game. China knows which way the wind is blowing. Their leadership can actually understand that 800 ppm CO2 by the end of the century (a conservative estimate)is a very serious risk to its people. China is going green because it knows that some day very soon the rest of the planet will wake up and when they do the Chinese will already be at the breakfast table. And even if global warming never happens, China knows full well what dependency on Saudi oil can do to a country. They just look at us.

This is one of the least illuminating articles from you people in a while... just a hiccup? Hope so.
Comment by Ron Kilmartin on 2009-10-24
Others have noted the author's mislabeling of CO2 as a pollutant, so I will not go there except to note the black cloud hovering over China has nothing to do with CO2 and everything to do with pollutant control that American coal plants have had for years.

Judging from the quality problems that China is having with many things (paint, dry wall, etc), I would be reluctant to buy any solar panels made in China.
Comment by walter feuchs on 2009-10-24
Don't be surprised when China unviels visuals of the assembly of the major components of a $100, 000 zero energy house in a matter of hours. The building envelope features integtated PV's, an Energy Star, hurricane and a seismic rating, fabricated in 14 man-hours with zero waste. The collective technology is replicable in the USA, and nationally code approved.

China could become a huge provider of "green collar" jobs in America. Today's new homes are still built to the "folk art" technology of nailing sticks together. It's time for disruptive changes, not "talk".

In good years, 1.7 new homes are built annually in the USA. China could looking a one million zero energy homes assembled annually across the globe earning conservativel $20 billion annually. Another billionnaire will arise thanks to climate change.
Comment by Canada Guy on 2009-11-13
Glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau are the source of 10 major rivers in Asia and provide water for almost half the world's population. Yet, according to the IPCC, they are melting faster than any other glaciers on the planet. China is now diverting much of the remaining supplies, leading to shortages in other countries and increased political tension.