Views: 4761
Text:

Becoming Peak Oil Aware: Part 1

Is the Threat of Peak Oil Back? Did It Ever Leave?

By Keith Kohl
Monday, April 12th, 2010

I was in shock last week.

After looking over the latest entries to top my 9 Things We'll See Down the Back Side of Peak Oil list, I came across a comment that blindsided me.

(By the way, you still have a little bit of time to toss in your own entries, if you haven't gotten a chance to do so... )

It wasn't some clever or humorous poke at life after peak oil. Rather, it was a simple question that stood out from every other e-mail I had received.

In a nutshell, the poor guy had never even heard of peak oil.

Advertisement

The Next GE

Thanks to a push to revolutionize our power grid…

A small group of hi-tech startups is about to take a major chunk out of a $297 billion/year market.

In the coming years, these outfits will become the next GE, the next Google, and the next Microsoft.

Get their names and ticker symbols now, before they take off.


Now I realize that there are people who haven't ever heard of peak oil, and I do occasionally encounter the random passerby with a lot of questions on the subject. But I certainly didn't expect for that passerby to be one of my readers.

I can forgive him because he was quick to admit that he'd only recently joined our ranks. And I shouldn't expect every one of you to know about peak oil... should I?

Peak Oil is Not a Myth

Peak oil is not a myth. It isn't a concept created in the boardroom of some secret meeting amongst oil companies, conjured up as a way to scare people senseless.

Peak oil is very real.

Don't believe me?

The U.S. and Mexico are poster children for peak oil theory. For those of you that scoff at the notion and dismiss it as foolishness, consider the following...

In 1970, the U.S. was at the height of its oil production. That year, U.S. fields produced 9.6 million barrels of crude oil per day. Things were on the rise. During October and November of 1970, U.S. production had increased to more than 10 million barrels per day.

Unfortunately, those two months were the last time Americans smiled about domestic oil production. Since then, U.S. production has been in decline.

Take a look for yourself, courtesy of the Energy Information Administration (EIA):

U.S. Oil Production since 1979 EIA

I can only imagine what some people said at the time... probably something to the effect of, "Things will pick up again... don't worry."

To this day, Texas remains our leading producer. Yet Texas production doesn't give us much to smile about; production there has been in trouble for decades.

Texas Oil Production Decline

But, before the doom and gloom takes over, remember that Texas is still our largest oil producing state, and that fact isn't going to change anytime soon.

And there is at least one area of the United States where production is increasing. (I'll get to that in just a minute.)

Mexico's Peak Oil Trouble Continues

If the U.S. is a good example of a country sliding down the back side of peak oil, Mexico's Cantarell field is our second lesson.

First, meet the Ku-Maloob-Zaap oil field. Ku-Maloob-Zaap is currently Mexico's most productive oil field, mostly thanks to three large fields: Ku, Maloob, and Zaap. The offshore fields produce more than 800,000 barrels of oil per day.

The only good news about Mexico's oil production is still bad news: Pemex recently announced that oil production is still falling, but at a slower rate than in 2009.

News wasn't always bad. I remember when the Cantarell field was pumping out more than two million barrels of oil per day in 2003. Of course, that's after Pemex began injecting Nitrogen into the field. A year later, the Cantarell field was forecast to decline by 14%.

By July 2008, when oil prices were peaking at $147 per barrel, people were recklessly throwing money at the oil industry. I can't really blame them — analysts were screaming for oil prices were heading to $200 per barrel by year's end.

For Cantarell, things weren't as cheerful as the oil price projections. That July, production had fallen 36% compared to the previous July. What once was the second largest oil field in the world was producing approximately 973,000 barrels per day. By 2009, production had dropped another 38% to about 770,000 barrels per day.

Don't be surprised when Mexican oil exports completely dry up in the next five to ten years. As if that weren't enough to worry about, think of how much trouble the country will be in after losing their oil revenue, which makes up 40% of the government's budget.

Due to lower oil prices in 2009, Mexico lost out on approximately $23 billion in oil revenue. Perhaps Mexico is destined to become America's 51st state.

The Other Side of the Fence

Earlier, I told you not to let the doom and gloom take over; there is a bright spot amidst the dark news for oil production.

One state has been having tremendous success lately: North Dakota. According to data from the EIA, North Dakota oil production has been on the rise for more than six years.

This boom is the reason that readers of the $20 Trillion Report have closed 22 straight winning positions... and the best part is the profit run is far from over. Take a minute and read more about how you can join in the wild profit taking.

Looking Forward...

Today was just a starting point.

The fact is there's too much to learn about peak oil than one can possibly cover in a day. Next week, I want to show you why we can't rely on the mighty OPEC to save us from a global peak in oil production. If nothing else, you'll understand why they can't be trusted.

Stay tuned.

Until next week,

keith kohl

Keith Kohl

Energy and Capital

Advertisement

The Next GE

Thanks to a push to revolutionize our power grid…

A small group of hi-tech startups is about to take a major chunk out of a $297 billion/year market.

In the coming years, these outfits will become the next GE, the next Google, and the next Microsoft.

Get their names and ticker symbols now, before they take off.



Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (8 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by A Leupold on 2010-04-12
Although oil production will decrease as the stores are used up, that is not the reason for decreasing U.S. production. U.S. production has been artificially limited by government restrictions on drilling. We have many potential sites that would increase our production significantly, if they could be used. North Dakota is a good example of that.
Comment by james dionegan on 2010-04-12
Yep, there is peak oil. But the question is where is it. My reading says that last year oil production INCREASED, and that N. Dakota surpassed Texas in oil production. And there is a strong rumor that a gigantic oil field has been discovered...covering more than 30 counties in Texas. And why does everyone forget about the oil in Iraq.
Comment by John Sloan on 2010-04-12
HI
I don't disagree with the general idea of 'peak oil' But the obvious reason the US does not produce more oil is POLITICAL. I am not saying that production would exceed what was produced in, say, 1970 - but it certainly could be much greater than it is now if government didn't block it.
best wishes
john
Comment by James Nelson on 2010-04-12
Dear $20 Trillion Dollar Report,

I have heard about peak oil for several years now.

There has developed in my mind over the last 2-3 years AB(after Bakken or at least after I heard of the Bakken) the idea that if oil is found today 5 or more miles under ground or the same distance beneath ocean floors that there could be untold numbers of barrels yet to be discovered in many, maybe most, of the successful rather shallow oil fields where oil has already been pumped out of the ground for many, many years. Production has slowed in so many of these old fields that some are considered to be drying up.

Since most of these old wells used straight down drilling techniques it is possible the oil bearing underground strata could have been somewhat shallow. If so, such a well drilled the old straight down way would not produce nearly as much oil as it could from a thicker oil strata.

Has horizontal drilling been attempted in many of these old shallow wells where the oil bearing strata was considered rather thin? I understand much of the Williston Basin is made up of rather thin oil bearing strata but when they turn the drill bit 90% in the middle of these strata they can extend that "sweet spot" up to a mile or more. This is what blows my mind about horizontal drilling and makes the Bakken such a fascinating oil play.

Are you aware of any Bakken like, horizontal shallow or deep drilling efforts taking place today in any of the old shallow fields. If so, could you name some of the companies engaged in this activity?

It just seems to me that perhaps so much more oil could be extracted from these old oil fields if modern drilling techniques were utilized.

Thanks for your response.
Comment by Chuck S on 2010-04-12
It doesn't make sense to leave out the oil that's available but blocked by governements. Like ANWR Alaska, offshore US, and some big offshore discovery in Mexico that they won't let foreign companies get to.

Maybe there is really peak oil, but you're so inaccurate leaving out those facts that your analysis is obviously way off. How about accurately accounting for everything?
Comment by Gilbert Eriksen on 2010-04-12
The peak oil thing is actually true... sort of. It's true that we might have extracted the "easy oil"... basically the "light, sweet crude"... the stuff with high gasoline content... that pumps out easily. It's not true that we have left holes/fields that are actually "dry". We normally get from 1/3 to 1/2 the oil out of the ground before it's too hard to pump any more out. That leaves a lot more down there that is not captured. Under US soil there is still something like 336 Billion barrels left that we can't extract... supposedly. If a way could be found to get the rest of it, how hard would it be to find the financing to develop the equipment and procedures to remove the rest of it? It would require some real front money to build the hardware so the wannabe and fly weight types would not qualify.

Your thoughts?
Comment by on 2010-04-13
Oh, ye of little faith, This country dies not need another nay say'er!
Comment by Jamey Odau on 2010-04-13
Yes I beleive the article is correct. But not to pump or dump a stock Americans should look at SYNM and see what a marvelous and ingenious method of creating fuel will become .And not one drop imported....!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by K Weinberg on 2010-04-14
I just returned from Dubai. They tell me they are basically out of oil by 2020. They are working with German engineers to install solar fields. They believe their revenue from solar will surpass their total revenues from oil. For them it wasn't if, it was when and then what. I don't believe their solar will help us here in the USA!
Comment by Clayton Hoffarth on 2010-04-15
You are 100% right oil production in the known world is falling and will continue to fall. Technology cannot make up the difference, water flood had ruined a lot of potential recovery by swelling the formation. Our only hope until alternate sources can be found is to start switching to a natural gas based energy source. The decline curve on the Bakken and the Cardium is to high and there is still not a good pumping system to remove the liquid from the horizontal section. The research has all been aimed at drilling and fracing not sustaining production rates.
Comment by Mark L. Bowin on 2010-04-25
The idea that oil is strictly a byproduct of decaying vegetation and such has many dissenters in the world of science. These folks feel that oil is basically bubbling up (stated simply) continuously from deep in the earth. New discoveries in Canada (Pembrium or Cardium; always forget which is where0, the US Bakken shale; deep water reserves off the coast of Brazil; huge underwater potential in the Gulf of Mexico; Alaska. And don't forget the oil sands; Iraq and Kurdistan...huge unexplored areas in Africa in Ethiopia, Somalia... the list goes on and on. Oil prices will rise as much of the future production becomes more expensive to get to. But I believe we're far from running out. And read "The Population Bomb" where some fool predicted there would be too many people on this planet to support life ... and this "bomb" was supposed to go off years ago! Sorry, too lazy to look up the details. As a gold/oil/gas investor, I hope I'm wrong.... we'll see.
Comment by jr on 2010-04-25
Mark, Peak Oil doesn't imply we will run out of oil, it implies we will run out of "cheap oil", but i guess you were "too lazy" to look that up as well.