Download now: Cannabis Cash

TransCanada Shifts Focus from Alberta

Alaskan Pipeline to Ship to Pacific Rim

Written by Brianna Panzica
Posted May 4, 2012 at 4:55PM

TransCanada Corp. (NYSE: TRP), a Canadian oil pipeline company, had been planning a pipeline from the North Slope in Alaska to Alberta, Canada.

For timely approval, the company needed to get a certificate from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by October.

But on Wednesday, Alaska gave the company permission to change its focus.

In March, TransCanada announced a new plan for a liquefied natural gas pipeline that could export the product overseas.

Commissioners from Alaska Revenue and Natural Resources changed the certificate deadline for the Alberta pipeline until 2014—all the work that has been done so far will be maintained and held until the new date.

The pipeline had started to put a strain on the company, says Kurt Gibson, director of the Alaska Pipeline Project Office, and a new focus was necessary:

“The challenge to this project is it’s so big and moves so slowly because of its size—and the costs and risk associated with it—that by the time it generates some momentum, the market conditions have changed.”

The size and destination for the pipeline have yet to be determined, but Gibson said this preliminary work should be complete by September.

Since 2008, TransCanada has had exclusivity in natural gas pipelines in Alaska.  It still maintains this contract, but it will team up with BP, ConocoPhillips, and Exxon Mobil to sell the liquefied natural gas that the pipeline will ship.

According to Alaskan Governor Sean Parnell, this sort of overseas shipment is necessary for Alaska to stay in the LNG market.  The abundance of natural gas produced in states like North Dakota is enough for domestic production and would exclude Alaska from that market.

The North Slope contains an estimated 35 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.  The new pipeline would allow exports to the Pacific Rim.

That’s all for now,


Related Articles

Politics Killed the Pipeline, Not the Profits
Energy and Capital editor Keith Kohl explains why Obama's rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline will have bigger consequences for us in the future.
TransCanada Looks for Options After Pipeline Rejection
After President Obama rejected the environmentally threatening Keystone XL, TransCanada is making other plans.
Pipeline Straight Talk
Here's some rare straight talk about the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry oil from Alberta's tar sands to refineries and distribution hubs in Illinois, Oklahoma, and the Gulf Coast.
Bakken Infrastructure Investing
Energy and Capital editor Keith Kohl explains a win-win scenario developing in bringing Bakken oil to market.