Gulf Oil Spill Coverage: Latest Gulf Oil Spill Updates: News, Pictures, Video Feeds | Live Oil Spill Camera Feeds
Views: 7524
Text:

The Alberta Oil and Gas Royalty Change

Defusing Alberta's Royalty Time Bomb

By Keith Kohl
Monday, February 1st, 2010

Politics is a dirty game.

I'll admit that most of the time, I wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole. But sometimes, politics are unavoidable — especially when they directly affect our investment decisions.

I'm not referring to U.S. politics, which are about as nasty as it gets. Today, my attention is fixated on Alberta: Canada's Energy Giant.

The Beginning of the End

I've been covering the ongoing debate over Alberta's oil and gas royalty changes for several years. In fact, I distinctly remember the day the Alberta Royalty Review Panel's report crossed my desk.

The title of the report was "Our Fair Share." The conclusion was easy enough to guess... In a nutshell, the report stated that Albertans do not receive their fair share; it went even further, saying that the government had failed to collect royalties already owed.

Advertisement

I've Uncovered A Photograph that Could Hand You $36,950 by this Time Next Year...

I don't blame you if this sounds far-fetched...

In fact, if I hadn't met the man who traveled 1,400 miles to track me down — just to hand me a photo — I wouldn't have believed it, either.

But once you take a peek at the snapshot, as well as the three reasons it could make you rich, I have no doubt you'll change your mind. 


From that moment on, I had this eerie feeling that Alberta was in for some trouble.

And sure enough, five weeks later, I read another report about the new royalty framework. The first sentence stood out: In the words of Alberta's Premier, Ed Stelmach, "I made a commitment and I delivered."

His commitment was to review the current oil and gas royalty structures in Alberta.

Well, he definitely delivered.

Unfortunately, he sent energy companies scrambling to get out of the province.

Trust me, the ball hasn't been dropped this bad since Edmonton sold Gretsky to the Kings... I'm sure my Canadian readers — especially those of you in Alberta — still have some anger issues over that debacle.

Of course, when it comes to politics, the approval of your constituents could mean the difference between another term and a plane ticket home... 

So how have things turned out for Mr. Stelmach?

Suffice to say you'd be hardpressed to find someone with lower approval ratings.

Okay, maybe it's not fair to compare Ed with U.S. presidents... but just to give you an idea, think about our pal G.W., who left the White House with a 22% approval rating — the lowest in history. Now compare that with the abysmal 14% carried by Stelmach at the end of 2009.

Sure, you can pin the blame on the economic turmoil. Or can you?

Remember how I said that these royalty changes have sent energy companies running? Well, you can take a guess on where those companies went. Don't worry — you won't need more than one. Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall is enjoying a 58% approval rating — the second highest rating among the provincial leaders.

Then again, he's reiterated his stance on not changing Saskatchewan's royalty structure too many times for me to count.

Considering 30% of Alberta's revenue comes from royalties from non-renewable resources, driving away that oil and gas development certainly isn't helping matters.

The Competitiveness Review Report: Stelmach's Last Chance to Save His Job

Since I first read that report in 2007, it has changed approximately five times. But this is this simply a case of "too little too late" for attracting more energy companies.

Believe me, the new set of changes needs to sweeten the pot if Alberta wants to keep up with its neighbors.

Something else to consider is whether or not Alberta has burned its bridges with the energy industry.

Anyone else remember Chavez nationalizing Venezuela's oil industry? Do you find it surprising that their latest auction for oil-drilling rights only brought in two bids? Only three projects received offers.

Alberta hasn't dug themselves that far into a hole, but time is running out.

In a matter of weeks, we might have our answer. Alberta's energy department is expected to release a new competitive review report. The competitive review was first announced last summer, as a growing number of companies flocked to neighboring provinces.

Profiting from Inevitability

While there's no doubt the upcoming revisions in the competitiveness report will be favorable for Alberta energy companies, the terms may turn out better than expected. Offering more favorable terms is the only thing Alberta can do to save face with the energy industry.

How far the government is willing to go is another matter itself, but we'll know the conditions soon enough. I'd love to hear you weigh in on this subject — especially my Canadian readers. Just click on the Comment/Rate this Article button below to give me your two cents on the matter.

Judging from the latest conversations I've had with my readers living in Alberta, I'm not alone in pointing out Stelmach's failures.

It's time for Alberta to sink or swim.

You see, upcoming unconventional plays like the Horn River Basin in British Columbia, or even the mighty Bakken oil play in Saskatchewan, are constantly stealing the spotlight.

It's difficult for me not to talk about some of those plays.

Take my readers at the $20 Trillion Report, for example. They've made a small fortune from Canada's energy war. One play alone has given them gains of 241%, 300%, 127%...

If you haven't joined their success, take a few minutes to read over this free special report. Inside, you'll finally understand why the one of the hottest oil plays in North America has been grossly underestimated for the last fifty years. Just click here to access to the report.

Yet no matter how much Alberta's situation appears to be nothing but doom and gloom, don't think that Alberta is down for the count.

In fact, there's one very specific reason why Alberta getting back on track.

I like to think of it as the ace up Alberta's sleeve. Within the next few days, I'm going to tell you all about it — including several investments that are giving Alberta oil fever all over again.

Until next time,

keith kohl

Keith Kohl

Energy and Capital

Advertisement

The Samurai's Secret that can Make You 2682%
 
700 years ago, the first true Samurai blade was born after a few grains of this metal was added. Today, that metal is indispensable to modern industry, and yet, we're running short.
 
Find out why the Chinese are now hoarding every ounce they can get their hands on... And how one company may have found the solution to a global crisis.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (13 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by robert gregory on 2010-02-01
keith, i have worked in alta in the exploration side and it has virtually stalled for the past 4 years for various reasons. living in newfoundland however with our premier/province taking part as a equity partner on the big plays has proven to be very good so far but then again the offshore oil is plentiful and safe for the majors compared to chavez deals.rg.
Comment by Mike Glennon on 2010-02-01
Oilco's want one thing above all else,Stability (of the fiscal regime).

With the capital intensive investments required for oil sands development, in particular, there has to be a high level of certainty that the rules just won't change.

The Canadian Oil & Gas Industry has a long memory.

Mike Glennon
President & CEO
Evolve Energy Partners
Comment by Steve on 2010-02-01
It will be intersting to see how the rise of the Wild Rose Alliance Party impacts Alberta's energy sector. I'm an Albertan and if I'm confident the Wild Rose can defeat Ed Stelmach's party they will almost certainly have my vote. I still need to learn more about them. It is high time Alberta had a Classical Liberal option on the ballot.
Comment by Rick on 2010-02-01
Kieth
You need to go back 30+ years to when Alberta unilaterally raised royalties followed by the federal government's disallowance of these royalties in the subsequent National Energy Program to see a comparable industry reaction. While I haven't been following the situation closely, I believe that Alberta has modified the increases causing the "exodus". Part of the reason for the exodus however is the maturity of producing fields and the increasing costs of finding and producing new discoveries. It is interesting to note that "socialist" Saskatchewan has not altered the royalty rates despite the progress in the Bakken/Williston Basin.I suppose they are looking to make up any losses in revenue from potash.
Rick Parton
Comment by Robert Perry on 2010-02-01
Kevin, I travel on business all across Canada and have been doing so for 20 years. The change in Saskatchewan in the last 5 years is remarkable, and reminds me of Alberta 20 years ago.

Alberta O&G enjoys a scale advantage right now, that Sask will soon catch up on, but right now all my money is in Sask, Bakkens and Potash and will remain there until I see the frontier spirit return to Alberta.
Comment by Rene Duguay on 2010-02-01
Excellent article!

I did not know exactly what was the problem in Alberta, although I have owned a great stock in the area on and off over the last 4-6 years approximately, not sure when I first got involved, Baytex..

also they are in the Cardium amongst some other area plays. Now that you have explained clearly and concisely on the situation, I vey much appreciate..Thank you!
Comment by Andy Smith on 2010-02-01
Keith - you normally are spot on, but with this one you need to know the whole storey (and I don't vote for Ed). He hired the world's experts to come up with a fair structure, one that used Alaska and Norway as comparisons. We were getting hosed, no contest. Unfortunatly, a world recession happened along, and now it it is a race to the royalty bottom between BC, Sask. and Alberta. My complaint is, no communication between 3 similar governments. If they had set this up right, the drillers would drill where the oil was best accessed, not where the royalty structures dictate. Sad, isn't it. Alaska has no taxes, Norway has 400B, we (AB) has about 15B.
Comment by G. Benson on 2010-02-01
As someone who was born and raised in Ontario, I have to laugh when an American tries to make sense of Canadian politics - particularly at the provincial level.
Stelmach is a red Tory from all reports - his farming background no doubt contributed to this. Please be aware that there are NO real business friendly parties here in Canada. We have only varying degrees of socialist dolts who love to tax and spend much like Obama and Pelosi. Stelmach has squandered his political good will and seems determined to drive out the oil companies with increased royalties. When Alberta has no surplus, watch what happens. Quebec won't have anyone to hand them billions in transfer payments. You'll be able to hear the rest of the country laughing all the way down in Florida! The USA shouldn't look for intelligent business practices here. At least we have a quasi-conservative Prime Minister who doesn't attack Bay St. and the banks!!! Saskatchewan was NDP socialist for many years and now it's the place to be on the continent. Go figure.
Comment by Derryl Hermanutz on 2010-02-01
If you follow Alberta politics you'll know that since our founding 2 years ago the Wildrose Alliance Party has been growing gangbusters and now enjoys popular support far above the Stelmach government. We are gaining MLAs and expect to form the Provincial government after the next election in 2012. We are already driving the Stelmach agenda, and a strong point of our policy has been from the beginning to oppose messing with Alberta's tried and true royalty structure. Albertans make lots of money by working in oil and gas. Alberta and Canada make lots of money by collecting personal and corporate income taxes from all this productive and profitable work; and Alberta was making bountiful royalties before the Stelmach government made its big mistake. We make our money by working for it. We don't make money by robbing our core industries and chasing them into the arms of more welcoming locales.

At a meeting of the Wildrose Party in 2007, before we joined forces with the Alberta Alliance, we had Allan MacRae as a guest speaker. Mr. MacRae was involved in and explained to us the 7 year long negotiation process that originally decided the royalty structure for Suncor and Syncrude many years ago. Then the Our Fair Share team went to work in 2007 and in a mere 4 months, without seeking significant input from industry insiders who know the economics, the jolly Sharistas decided Alberta should breach the remaining 16 years of our contract with Suncor and Syncrude and "renegotiate" their royalties.

A senior player in the Wildrose Party is involved in gas, and I asked him if there are really so many marginally profitable gas plays in Alberta that what seemed like a minor increase in gas royalties would shut them down. His unequivocal answer? Yes. Gas is a risky business and even a small hit to potential profitability is enough to prevent exploration and development. As you noted in your article, Alberta lost and BC and Saskatchewan gained. They reduced their government take, Alberta increased ours, and investment went where it was welcome.

The new royalty regime came into effect on Jan.1/09 and was supposed to bring in an additional $1.4 billion per year in royalties. But already in 2008 Alberta LOST nearly a billion dollars in lease sales, while BC and Saskatchewan each gained hundreds of millions of lease sales to reach unprecedented record investment levels. Alberta's exploration industry moved next door and, again as you note in the article, Stelmach's gang who couldn't get their policy straight have 'adjusted' the new royalties 5 times already. Like you, we are hoping and expecting that the government will get it right this time with its new study of the issue. Meanwhile, we're happy to see BC and Saskatchewan making themselves open for business and developing their resources. With Alberta back in the game it will be a good 3 way competition for investment and development.

Gas prices are slowly crawling out of the 'financial crisis' meltdown and Alberta's fiscal situation is improving, but a combination of the Our Fair Share attack on our energy industry and the collapse in oil and gas prices put debt-free Alberta into deficit in 2009. But with the continuing push from us Wildrosers and Albertans natural culture of work and entrepreneurship I think Alberta will soon be shining again.
Comment by Kris on 2010-02-01
I am from Edmonton and I live there, I must say I agree with you completely and if Ed doesn't make some pretty significant changes in the comming weeks, he will definately be looking for a new job after the next elections. I think I can pretty much speak for a good majority of the people of Alberta on that subject, the sentiment seems to be the same across the board.
Comment by Tom Martin on 2010-02-01
I'm a farmer from Saskatchewan. I golf with the energy minister. I told him to include Stelmach in his Xmas cards. The day after Brad Wall won the election, the oil & gas rigs were pouring in. There could be another oil shale play in the near future in Sask. Check out Canshale Corp. It's not on the stockmarket yet. Cheers Tom
Comment by Dave on 2010-02-01
We were looking at making a substantial energy investment in Alberta but changed course when the trusts were to be taxed in 2011..that was a huge mistake in Canada..Capital goes where it is wanted and rewarded and its a big world!
Comment by Del Hankinson on 2010-02-01
I don't agree with the basis of your article, ie that Stelmach changed the royalties and drove oil companies out of Alberta.

The voters in Alberta, having been whipped into a frenzy over royalties by the Press and the Opposition,wanted a Review and changes to the royalties. I mean 80% of the voters wanted that. Stelmach had absolutely no choice but to review the Royalties. Alberta's royalties are less than Texas!And about middle of the road for most jurisdictions. The oil companies and related service companies have been complaining about it ever since. However, if you read about new oil sands developments, there will be a boom in construction again, and there is a predicted labour shortage in the next 12 to 18 months.

If you talk to southern Albertans, they are against the royalty review, if you talk to northern Albertans, they don't think the government went far enough.
Comment by Renee Haraga on 2010-02-01
You've hit the nail on the head. Stelmach and his whole party are low on my totem pole. Right next to Harper and Flarherty after the income trust fiasco.
Comment by Susan Fisher on 2010-02-01
I couldn't agree more. Even if Stelmach wises up now, I believe it's too late for him. Even my arch-Conservative friends (and there are many of those in Alberta) have had it with this government's ruining of the Alberta economy.
Comment by Mark on 2010-02-02
Hi there. I live in Calgary, Alberta so I thought I would give you my two cents worth on this.

First of all I have been following E&C for 2-3 years now and I would agree with most of what is said about global energy. The negative side of getting every last bit of oil and gas isn't talked about much though. The oil sands are a FUCKING DISASTER! To think we can treat the earth this way and get away with it indefinitly is insane! But the few in power and the redneck Albertan simply won't look at any other options. Let me make this very clear...most Albertans are not benefiting from the boom (that we HAD). Only a select few made a bundle while the rest had to deal with huge increases in price on everything, pollution, traffic etc. We did get sold out for our energy and the companies walk away from the environmental catastrophies.
We have some of the best solar and land based wind resources in Canada and yet we are falling further behind in those sectors. I have been looking into renewable energy for a career change and I talked to a solar distributor here who told me Ontario is the place to be. Other Solar companies have told me that pretty much any other provice is better for renewables because of their provincial support. Alberta wants to be energy leaders but they don't want to touch the future of energy. Go figure?

Comment by Gordon on 2010-02-02
Great article, especialy from someone who is not "local".
I have worked in the Tar sands for nearly 10 years and it seemed to get bigger and bigger each year. In fact it was mind boggling. I realize there has been a bit of a recession last year but not only has there been mass lay offs in Fort Mcmurray, it looks like it will be stagnant until.......exactly as you had predicted. Until the government gets back in the act and levels off the royalties. I also think that Alberta is charging lower royalties than what they should but they are now in a position where it is 'shit or get off the pot' They either have to be prepared to hold out, which will negatively affect their economy in the short time but will bring increased royalties in the future ( the oil is here and everyone is going to want it and the longer Alberta holds onto it, the more value it has) or lower their royalties and reap the benefits today. Tough decision. I don,t think you should be dissing Stelmach for trying to make a tough decision that might look bad today but will bring higher dividends in the future. You talk a lot about "peak oil" which means that Alberta's tar sands could become much more valuable in the future. As I said, it is a tough decision for Stelmach to make as so many people in Alberta are used to making "tons" of money therfore are harder hit when times slow down a bit.
I really enjoy your reporting.
I am "riding" Wesport Innovations right now, any tips?
Comment by Steve on 2010-02-02
Bring back King Ralph! The only politician I ever liked.
Steve
Alberta, Canada
Comment by Carl on 2010-02-02

I might be able to put one penny's worth, first the Oil comp'ies are some what like corp bums, they expect to keep it all, they got so used to this free ride (not paying royalties), not being charged the same as other countries,and the more Mr Panick Ed gives the more they ask for, why not that was their success under King Ralph
so why not try with Mr. Ed.
Comment by b. mc millan on 2010-02-02
premier "ED" continues to drop the ball regarding the infamous "fair share" royalty changes. albertans have suffered - most of our royalties actually come from gas production. it's been stated that we have lost more oil royalties from oil sands production since those initial changes. now we have Mr ron liepert as our new minister of energy - god help us - thats the same guy that just castorated our public health care system here in alta. it will be years before the oil patch companies flock back to alta - british columbia and saskatchewan were the big winners, and "ed", well, he'll be gone in late 2011 at election time.
Comment by Edward Gilbert on 2010-02-02
Excellent our Canadian writers are not often so fortcoming.
Comment by john doerksen on 2010-02-02
I was utterly dismayed when Ed Stelmach was elected Premier of Alberta and one of the very first things he did was to up the royalties on oil and gas. Only about a year before Saskatchewan had elected a new premier who was friendly to businesses and to oil companies after many years of anti-business socialists. Saskatchewan had been a poor "have not" province for decades. By the simple act of lowering the royalties the new Saskatchewan premier turned the fortunes of the province around in a very dramatic way. Stelmach bought into the socialist dogma of "taxing the rich" which may have set Alberta's economy back a decade, or more. When oil companies pull up stakes you can't get them back the next day. It took two decades for Alberta to recover from the National Energy Program. I'd hate to see a replay of that fiasco.
Comment by rick on 2010-02-02
Your right Eddy is kind of a bumbling fool. He screws up in Agriculture just as much, I suspect lots of other areas too.

Your statement that Alberta has to act now to sink or swim may be a little over stated. I'm may be wrong but I believe about 70% of the wells drilled in Canada are still drilled in Alberta plus the Oilsand spending would equate to alberta recieving the lion share of energy spending in spite of Eddy.

Its nice to see things spread out to give Sask BC Newfoundland some much needed $$4 and employment.
Comment by Taras Bunka on 2010-02-02
Sir,
Is there any jurisdiction that charges a lesser royalty than Alberta? Alberta pumped oil for 60 years before Norway (pardon the swearword)and has $11.0 bil in its Heritage Fund, while Norway has $400.0 bil, and Venezuala $0.8 bil During the war years (Alberta vs Trudeau 1981-1985)(Trudeau lost)During this period Venezuala pumped $153.7 bil of oil, Norway $42.7 bil, and Canada $105.9 bil.Now, seeing as how the right wing in the Canadian Press always maintain that Trudeau got $100.0 bil of that $106 bil, Trudeau did leave Alberta $6.0 bil to man the pumps. Right!? So, during this awful period, Norway pumped 17% of the oil and now has $400.0 bil in the kitty, vs $12 bil for Canada/ Venezuala. Oh yes, East Timor, a little over a million people, and pumping a little over 100,000 boed started their fund in 2004, and now approaching $5.0 bil. So who do you say are the smart people? Taras
Comment by anderson on 2010-02-02
"Alaska has no taxes..."

What? You do know that every man, woman and child in Alaska is paid off monthly by skimmed oil revenue, right?
Comment by Paul Tatarewicz on 2010-02-03
The unfortunate part of Alberta's oil and royalties bonanza is that much of it has gone into a meddlesome and initiative-stifling bureaucracy at the provincial and cities level rather than going solely into an investment fund from which revenues could pay for services in perpetuity. Alberta probably spends more on health than any other province but this sector has become so loaded with bureaucrats that wait times in emergency wards as as bad if not worse than anywhere else.
Comment by Mitch on 2010-02-07
I live in Grande Prairie Alberta,since the royalty bs started, my city has went from a very good place to live and work with business haveing to import people to fill the need to beening a place of the highest unemployment in the country, our priemer has no idea what the h he's done.
Comment by JFCross on 2010-02-07
I am a believer in 'pay as you go' Yes, I sometimes have a balance on my credit card! Going 'where the money is' is usually preferable to - defaults, xxissing it away, reving up the future generations and expecting (no) free lunch. If you spend, pay it off, yourself - don't mess up your own back yard.
Comment by Donna on 2010-03-13
I am a born and raised Albertan,my family has been in the Calgary area since the early 1800's,and own mineral rights.When Alberta became dept free not so long ago,It was a day of rejoicing.And we did it through the good and the bad times,Mr.ED and those who convinced him of calling in the very royalies that King Ralph nurtured,Well Mr.Ed doesn't get it.You are all so right,when you say"that the oil and gas industry has a long memory,What happened to the good old boys of this province where we stood together and put trash where it is meant to be.It is time for all of us to stand together and put "Little RK" Danielle Smith in power,Wild Rose Alliance.
Ed must have been nutured,early in life,Wasn't Mr. ED a horse?We need to send him back to his farm and strap him in front of a plow,with a whip cracking over his head,thats about the only thing that,that guys good for,HE IS NOT A LEADER.This is a perfect example of that you have to experience some bad before you can find someone good.
Wild Rose Alliance GRoup and the people of Alberta's slogan will be,that we're going to "SHOOT SHOVEL AND SHUT UP" where Mr Ed is concerned and anyone who chooses to hold little Ed's hand.
I pray to God+ that the Good Old Boys in the Oil and Gas industry and World Wide will beleive in the true Alberta people,that we will fix this problem to the benefit of us all and for the success of the future of our Alberta.She belongs to everyone who has benefited from her wealth of resources.And SHE will rise again.Cheers to our future success!
Comment by Diane on 2010-03-16
Mr. Kohl, First allow me to express my gratitude on your news letter. I am a member of Energy and Capital since 2009. I have been reading you prior to this for a while and finally had the courage to sign up to get the inside scoop on something of interest to me: ENERGY!
I follow energy closely because when I am not flying for a major Canadian airline , I manage and aquire Real Estate in Canada. My first RE purchase based on fundamentals lead me to Alberta 2 years ago, specifically Fort Mcmurray. It's been an incredible learning experience to invest in another province as I live in the "have not province" as they call it, Ontario. My many years of flying also have changed in a new and strange way since investing in Real Estate and learning everything I can about energy. I meet so many amazing people on my flights. The past month I met 2 geologists as I have been flying to Phoenix , AZ... I also met someone on the way home from Phoenix.. the logo on the papers looked Canadian... I am always curious... well it turns out that this person is with CPP: Canadian Petrolium Producers. I expressed my intrigue in energy... started asking questions, looking for an opinion.The response is always funny because they are ALWAYS surprised that I know what I know... because I READ YOU! This person changed after a few minutes in our conversation... seemed more relaxed as I asked about Alberta's Royalties and their lack of competition with their neighbours. This person sat back in the business class seat and was very confidant that the Royalty review was going to be just fine. " Don't worry","we are fixing that"... Hey, it's not much but you know this is my first post and I wanted you to know that one more person is reading YOU in Ontario and learning from you to GUIDE me in a more precise direction. I will always do my due diligence. I tell my friends that Alberta is the place to be for a job, for growth and for it's tax benefits! Since I can not live there, I decided to invest there! The world is a small place, I know that much! Sincerely, Diane PS: I agree with a post below , Ontario is the place to be for F.I.T. My plan is to make a profit from the "black gold" to buy Green Energy!