The Future of the Southwest: Localization and Carrying Capacity

Make Your Picks On Route 66

By Chris Nelder
Friday, January 8th, 2010

For the holidays this year, I stuck with my vow to never fly again at Christmas and opted to drive the roughly 1,600 mile round trip instead.

It's only a couple of hours longer than flying, each way, a bit cheaper, and a whole lot more enjoyable. (And as for the carbon footprint, it's hard to say but probably smaller.)

On the way, I had ample time to muse about the future and take in the on-the-ground reality of the Southwest. Foremost in my mind was the question: How will these communities fare in the transition to a localized, renewably-powered future?

As I explained in my final columns of last year, I am pretty much done with talking about the problems of peak oil (really, "peak everything") and climate change. That message is tired, and the tipping points have arrived. The time for ringing the alarm bell and counting on federal or state solutions has passed. From now on, we all need to be eyes-front, focused on what we can do locally.

So I'd like to begin this year by sharing a few observations I made on my trip...

 

A View from the Road

California's Central Valley — the source of 8% of the nation's food supply — was my first long stretch southward through endless fields producing garlic, lettuce, fruits and nuts, grapes and raisins, and other produce. Staggering under the combined pressures of rising agricultural input costs, a falling water table, reduced water flows from the Sacramento Delta, and immigrant labor issues, it offered a clear window into the economic malaise of California's farming communities.

Just four days before Christmas, shopping mall parking lots looked only one-quarter full and the roads were mostly empty. Seemingly every industrial building along the highway through Modesto had a "For Lease" sign on it. The first hopping-busy shopping scene I saw was a flea market in the little farming town of Kingsburg. Highway marquees offered hotel rooms for $35 to $40 a night in Fresno. And in Bakersfield, the majority of billboards offered legal help to fight speeding tickets.

From there I headed west into one of the few places on earth that you're likely to see an oil pumpjack in a vineyard: the Kern County oil fields, where "horse head" pumps still wheeze away, squeezing the last drops from giant fields that have been in production since the late 1800s.

pump jack in kern county

A few miles farther down the road I climbed into the Tehachapi Pass, the site of one of the nation's oldest (and one of the world's largest) wind farms, producing over 1.4 billion kWh per year of electricity. Originally built in the early 1980s and updated over the years, it offers a unique look at evolution of wind technology, with over 5,000 turbines running the gamut from small, old, broken ones to modern 1.5 MW monsters operating at over 40% capacity factors. The area is slated for additional development this year, including a new 30 MW project by Western Wind Energy (CVE: WND).

wind turbines in tehachapi pass

(Sorry for the less-than-professional quality cell phone pics from the road. I could have found better ones online, but I liked the foto vérité of these.)

Continuing on through several hours of open desert strewn with plastic bags (if you still need a reason to carry your own reusable shopping bag, consider that one), I made my way into Mohave County, Arizona, along much of old Route 66. I soaked in the nostalgia of remnant, weathered hotels and restaurants from its glory days. A few isolated watering holes now sport their own wind turbines and solar PV arrays, but from what I overheard and saw on the local Craigslist, a job — any kind of job — was hard to find in these parts. Things have been tough ever since the real estate bubble popped.

This is mostly mining territory: a blue-collar, staunchly conservative county. Yet fully a quarter of a local rag I picked up — the Economic Development Journal of Mohave County out of Bullhead City, Arizona — featured stories on energy. There was fuss over the water requirements and transmission line siting for a proposed $2 billion, 340 MW parabolic trough concentrating solar thermal power (CSP) plant. New state rules requiring utilities to develop demand-side energy management and efficiency programs were discussed in detail, as was the award of Energy Star status to eight county buildings. There was even an account of a recent presentation by a university professor on peak oil.

mongollon rimI continued on to my family's cabin under the shadow of the Mogollon Rim, a roughly 200-mile-long escarpment at the edge of the Colorado Plateau that spans much of Arizona. It's an area well loved by the great Western novelist Zane Grey, who had a cabin near ours. We cozied up there for a week in wood-fired comfort in freezing temperatures, including a day spent fighting with old manually-oiled chain saws and laying up more wood, during which I momentarily wondered if it wasn't actually easier when I was a kid and we did it using a two-man cross-cut saw. He who cuts his own wood heats himself twice, as they say.

On the return trip, I detoured up to the Grand Canyon because I hadn't been there in many years. Unfortunately, it wasn't the best day to visit. A snowstorm had blown in to the Kaibab Plateau just as I arrived, making for very poor visibility (and some sketchy driving, even in 4WD).

The Kaibab, of course, is the site of one of the sharpest lessons in carrying capacity in American history. Beginning in 1906 at the order of President Teddy Roosevelt, hunting was banned and livestock grazing was curtailed in order to encourage the population of some 4,000 deer who made their home there. The following year, the Forest Service embarked on a program to kill the natural predators of deer, including mountain lions, wolves, coyotes, and bobcats. The deer population exploded and reached around 100,000 before overbrowsing of the sparse habitat caused them to starve to death. From 1925-1926, an estimated 60,000 deer died of starvation and the rangelands were permanently damaged, leaving it with a far lower carrying capacity. American wildlands management practices were forever changed, as we learned the importance of keeping animal populations within the ability of natural environments to sustain them.

The Energy Bull You Don't Want to Miss

Our analysts have traveled the world over, dedicated to finding the best and most profitable investments in the global energy markets. All you have to do to join our Energy and Capital investment community is sign up for the newsletter below. You'll also get our free report, Oil Outlook: Investing in 2011 by our resident energy expert, Keith Kohl.

Enter your email:
We never spam! View our Privacy Policy

grand canyon in snowstormMad Max Wasteland or Desert Oases?

The same lesson remains to be learned, however, with respect to human population. The problem of making our world sustainable is infinitely more complex.

What is the true carrying capacity of America, if the San Joaquin Valley's water problems persist? About one-fifth of California's total electrical power demand is used to pump water; about four-fifths of the water pumped in California is used to irrigate agriculture.

The ability of the state to build sustainable power supply — like those turbines in Tehachapi — has direct implications on the nation's food supply. Likewise, much of the population of Los Angeles could not exist without the massive pipeline system that brings the city water from the Colorado River.

How will the little mining towns of northwestern Arizona fare as fossil fuels decline? They'll still be able to ship their minerals by rail along the freight tracks I paralleled on Route 66, but they'll need to have alternate sources of revenue if peak oil quenches economic growth.

Supporting those proposed solar arrays and grid connections could mean the difference between thriving and shrinking, which explains why in a parched, windswept, and sun-baked land like Mohave County, the need for local water and energy supply is urgent enough to override the usual political bent and make strange bedfellows of Republicans and renewable energy advocates. Such alliances will become more common in a century of decline. Necessity wins over ideology every time.

In the Bay Area where I live, the last few years has seen an increasing incidence of water main breaks and exploding transformers, sewage spills, bridges becoming unsafe, and roads becoming more patch and pothole than pavement, as its aging infrastructure crumbles and fails. Governor Schwarzenegger went begging the federal government this week for financial aid, and proposed privatizing prisons in an effort to close a budget gap that now runs into the hundreds of billions. A downgrade of the state's debt rating seems inevitable for a state that is too big to not fail. Where will the revenue come from to fix all this, and keep the water flowing to the San Joaquin Valley, plus build out a new renewable energy and rail infrastructure?

Arizona's in only slightly better shape. A week before Christmas, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer told her cabinet to slash spending sharply and push criminal alien prisoners back onto the Feds as quickly as possible, as she faces the prospect of borrowing $700 million a month to stay operational, and a looming 2011 fiscal year deficit of $3.4 billion. Solar power could be a massive financial boon to the state, but popular support has been sluggish and the leadership has been slow to understand the energy-water nexus. The solar potential of Arizona is far greater with photovoltaics and air-cooled CSP than water-cooled CSP.

The food production of the San Joaquin; the wind turbines in Tehachapi; the oil fields of Kern County; the solar resource of Arizona; the water resources of the Rockies that sustain its dense low desert populations... these all depend in one fashion or another on a complex, interconnected infrastructure of commerce powered by cheap fossil fuels.

No one has even begun to seriously add up the costs of transitioning it to renewable power and rail transport. The tab will run into the double-digit trillions for the state of California alone. If the state fails — and I think it could — then where will the investment come from? Can we still imagine a debt-based federal infrastructure spending program that would utterly dwarf the New Deal? If not, then the transition will be financed and built from the bottom up... or not at all.

I'm still betting that trillions of dollars will be spent over the coming decades to cut waste, build more wind turbines and solar plants, erect a long distance HVDC transmission grid, implement a smart grid with micro-islanding capabilities, stimulate a rail renaissance, and try to keep the American machine humming.

That's why I call it "the greatest investment event of the century." The investment opportunity in the Southwest is absolutely staggering, if the capital can be found.

But should those efforts prove too little, too late — and by my count, we're already 30 years too late — the long-term fate of individual communities will be largely decided by what they do in the next two decades. What they have at the end of that period may be what they'll have to live with for many decades afterward. The resources they depend on today may be stranded.

My family may indeed fall back on the old cross-cut saw to cut our firewood. The Tehachapi locals may have power, but struggle to maintain food supply. The mining towns of Arizona may wish they'd done more to deploy solar, especially water-pumping solar systems, when the getting was good.

Communities that localize their supplies of food, water, and energy, with a sharp eye on local carrying capacity (which is to say, those who have the ability to disconnect from the complex systems around them and be self-sufficient), could have a reasonably good future. Those that don't may find themselves following the deer of the Kaibab Plateau.

The question for investors is this: Fifty years from now, will Route 66 be a blasted wasteland of ghost towns, a Mad Max relic of the fossil fuel age... or a string of small, self-sufficient oases, each with their own solar arrays, wind turbines, backyard gardens, and railroad depots?

I'll have more to say on that subject next week when I write for Green Chip Stocks.

Until next time,

Chris

All photos by Chris Nelder

P.S. It's amazing how some people still get cold feet when it comes to their investments. That should never be the case. Take my colleague, Ian Cooper, for example. He's had so much success trading in this market, his readers have made a small fortune. And things are about to get much better for them...

Last week, Denmark gave up its control of a tiny chunk of Arctic tundra that has a $273 billion secret — and Ian's prepared a detailed report to enable his readers to get an early foothold. You can read the free report here.


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (22 votes)




Comments:

Comment by Dennis Cleary on 2010-01-08
Great review of our SW. I've backpacked, hiked, and biked the areas you mentioned and you are dead on. Where will the SW end up in the future. I'm also an investor and subscriber to your service letters.Great over view of the territory and future predictions and perspective! Solid writing skills and good eyes and brain.
Comment by monica on 2010-01-08
Another sobering article - thank you Chris for your thoughtful and insightful composition.
Comment by Bela Szepsi on 2010-01-08
As goes California, so goes the Nation, was the saying when I lived in CA. Yes, after a stint of California's Governor, Reagan became President. Communism fell. But, CA became the playing field of the Left and is now bankrupt. The country is heading the same way. Glad you gave up talking about global warming. Heh, heh. It is 14 F outdoors in Texas. And the world is buried under snow. Geothermal and Atomics are the way to go. Wind and solar are too expencive, too intermittent and too unreliable.
Comment by CR Stark on 2010-01-08
Chris,
Great story. I have traveled parts of your route and have thoroughly enjoyed it. Life in the desert moves at a slower pace yet still continues to grow. Our country would do well to meet the needs and reduce our wants.
Comment by Ray Merry on 2010-01-08
Excellent, one of the best articles you have written, and I must agree. I come from the Midwest, but have been in Brazil for 6 years, and before that Florida and various other places. I had come to the same conclusion as you several months ago, that it was now up to the states to come to grips with their energy, water, economic and environmental problems. It seems the Federal Government can't get it right. The DOE was supposed to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Our dependence has gone up and the DOE is a huge monster. The states are like to former colonies of Rome, Britain, etc. after the empire has fallen. Some will prosper some will fall into a sad state.

Although I have not been back to the Midwest in some time I am impressed with what I have heard. They have and are promoting green roof programs, local energy generation, green building and numerous other smart ventures into the 21st Century Energy World. Many of the people still have a pioneering spirit, which is needed now to pioneer a new world order. The old world of oil dependence is dying and must be replaced. The King is Dead, Long Live the King!
Comment by Andy Smith on 2010-01-09
Always a good read, Chris. Up here in much colder Edmonton, we still enjoy the wealth oil has created but many of us see the brick wall coming. As chair of the local solar energy chapter I can tell you we are pushing hard for that 30 year late response to peak oil; it needs to be implemented now, and that is really the FIT that Ontario has going. This energy problem will hit both our societies square in the jaw very soon, and all of us need to start paying for the solution. The FIT results in a small increase in consumer energy costs (more for those who use more), and it is badly needed acorss the continent. No question. I engineer and build LRT stations and high rise office towers but my real joy is helping design the net zero energy homes that we have constructed here. 3 now and more on the way (google Riverdale netzero). If we can do it here, it can be done almost anywhere. Nice to read articles by you guys; you do understand the future issues.
Comment by Barlow Rhodes on 2010-01-09
This is the most well written description of our current situation and the possibilities that are available. Your reference to the Kaibab experiment lends an aura of consequences to our actions. Our national carrying capacity truly depends on what we are able to accomplish with the tools at our hands now.
Comment by Ira Cotton on 2010-01-09
I found the discussion interesting, though tainted at times by political philosophy. The author seems to advocate an unreasoned push to develop solar power sources NOW whether or not they are cost justified. Given the advances in technology in this area, it is reasonable to expect the efficiency of solar collectors to improve and costs decrease oer time, so there may well be benefits to waiting for the technology to become cost effective, rather than relying on government subsidy at this point. Why conservationists can't agree with Republicans on THAT I do not understand.
Comment by Keith Mowat on 2010-01-09
Your article reminds me of my favorite contempary American authors' version of his return to civilization in the late 80's -Bill
Bryson. Unfortunately many of his forecasts have turned out as true
in the 'Lost continent'.
Comment by Joachim Mueller on 2010-01-09
Excellent, though sad article. It makes clear that the economy is skewered. If the users of water and energy would pay the full price there would not be any shortage. The state of California obviously subsidised activities that did not pay back. By the way, I see this kind of waste of tax payer's money in many places. Companies have their own way of extortion. If California is the "largest economy" within the United States they did a poor job on profitability. Shame on them.

Can someone, please, explain to me why Californian oranges are cheaper in Florida than Floridian oranges? The same goes for strawberries. This insanity has to stop. Consumers have to be told to eat what is available at that time in their place! But for some reason no one in the USofA likes to tell hard facts that may be inconvenient. Cowards!!!

What needs to be done is use solar energy to desalinate ocean water. Only that way states like California and Arizona can survive. A good side effect would be that the effect of oceans rising would be slowed down. It takes creative thinking and not just worshipping the all mighty dollar.

What needs to be made clear is that the people who use the services have to pay the primary cost as well as the secondary cost. That means, if I take water from some place I also have to pay the cost of replenishing that resource.

In previous centuries it seemed that resources were inexhaustible. Though it was not true the economic power of the US was based on the exploitation of those resources. What counts now is that the greedy Wall Street bankers take some responsibility for their country and reroute some of their insane profits into helping their (??) country to survive. That would be real patriotism, much better than wearing a lapel pin with the US flag.

Things can be done. It only works if those stupid politicians stop using other people's money to pursue their own interest and if citizens stop whining and work for the common good.
Comment by Carl M. Welch on 2010-01-09
I would submit that your residency in the Bay area has blinded you to reality. Renewable energy, including wind,solar, geothermal,biomass,ethanol, etc. are unsustainable without government subsidies. Also, independent (non UN)data indicate that human-caused climate change cannot be demonstrated. I don't see that peak oil can be demonstrated either. From what I've seen over the last 60 years, the biggest impacts on the environment are farming, urban sprawl and highway building, California's favorite activities. Until we change our attitude to one of producing rather than consuming, our standard of living is going to decline. In the interest of disclosure, I am a geologist involved in resource production. I wish bloggers and others would indicate the axe they are grinding.
Comment by Katherine Shelly on 2010-01-11
I live in the Northeast. Marcellus shale country. Appalacia. We have our own problems stemming from peak oil, fossil fuel dependence, climate change--and now, a real possibility of losing our pure water.
An eye-opener to read your road trip article, think about drought, ageing infrastructure, energy crunch.
Every route needs its nodes of small self-sufficient and sustainable communities. And yes, we have a two-man crosscut saw, a small insullated cottage to hibernate in, vegetable gardens started and close friends with the same mind set.
Thanks again for your travel journal.
Comment by Robert Moore on 2010-01-11
In Colorado Springs, we have hydro electric capacity a couple of miles off grid for 1,680,000 homes. Instead of developing it, we burn a unit train of coal every day. To me, this is insanity.
And I offered the Governator all the money California could use and he rejected it. All he would need to do is implement a Lender Side Usury Tax (100% of all interest and fees above 8% APR) and money problems are instantly solved. Couple that with all interest being tax deductable not just mortgage interest and you have an instant boost to the economy, to budgets, and to job creation. My opinion, the loan sharking banks in collusion with bought off politicians are the cause of most of the problems. The Lender Side Usury Tax also would eliminate the need for redoing all the smoke and mirror banking regulations that Barny Frank is talking about which would waste more Congressional time and do nothing in the end.
Comment by Ron Shook on 2010-01-11
Chris,

Thanks for the travelog. It makes it more real, by a long shot. Your excellent writing would be even more potent if you throw in instances of personal experience and observation more frequently. It doesn't have to be one or the other. Mine that trip for awhile. (g)

"As I explained in my final columns of last year, I am pretty much done with talking about the problems of peak oil (really, "peak everything") and climate change. That message is tired, and the tipping points have arrived. The time for ringing the alarm bell and counting on federal or state solutions has passed. From now on, we all need to be eyes-front, focused on what we can do locally."

I know the feeling, but don't stop pounding on the big picture, because you present it better than anyone else I've run into. Your last few articles have been, IMO, the most cogent statements of systemic problems and solutions propounded by anyone, anywhere, including any of the big names of punditry. Freidman comes closest but he's too Polyannaish and must subscribe to the notion that we must hide "Peak Everything" under the "Global Warming" rubric to avoid creating panic, to avoid admitting to the double whammy. It might be time to panic more than a little, don't you think?

"Global Warming," as a rallying cry for doing the right things, has run its course, particularly after the bitter cold of this winter. It was a bad rallying cry to start with, because the problem is human engineered "Climate Change." No one, even the best climate scientests, really knows for certain how this will work out because climate change tipping points could very well go in the other direction, bringing on the next Ice Age. The geological record and cycles seems to indicate this as the greater possiblility.

Like you, I think, I've been feeling like I must stop talking and understanding and just start doing what I can on the local level. My tiny solution has been to build an electric powered adult tricycle with lots of carrying capacity as my own personal electric vehicle (PEV), an E-Trike. Since I'm a TV producer, I've documented the process, and will sell an inexpensive "Do It Yourself" DVD on the NET. It's not rocket science and anyone with a smattering of mechanical ability can do it.

I've discovered, much to some surprise, that I can use this around the city (Chicago), even most days in the winter, without undue pain and sacrifice for less than a nickle a trip. It's nearly as quick as with a car, quicker in rush hours, and is fun if you dress accordingly. Plus you can carry a whole family's weekly grocery needs in one trip with the slick road safety of a 3 wheeled vehicle, something impossible on an e-bike. Overall safety on roads with automobiles is an issue, of course, particularly if you don't drive it very defensively.

I firmly believe that something like this will be most family's second vehicle(s) in the years to come, particularly as the PEV's evolve to more comfort and ease.

I'm trying the ground floor here. (g)

Don't stop. Your time is coming, and I don't think that it is too far off.

SHARE / RATE