Current Rating:
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (15 votes)
Rate this Article Views: 1822
printer friendly Font Size: Small | Medium | Large

Market Outlook Part 3: The Bread Also Rises

Energy, Weather and Higher Food Prices

By Chris Nelder
Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008

[Third in a three-part series; see also Part 1: I'm Changing My Name to JPMorgan and Part 2: Skyrocketing Fossil Fuel Prices Favor Renewables.]

I don't know if I have ever shared this with my readers, but one of my pastimes is baking my own bread. In fact I often have a batch rising in the kitchen while I write my articles.

My mother was a huge influence on why I decided to take up this ancient art, which so few first-worlders practice anymore. To save a few bucks while trying to feed a family on a limited budget, my mother baked bread once a week for much of my childhood.

Those five loaves would last our family of five through the week-and we ate a lot of bread-for the low price of a 5-lb sack of flour, which was about $0.39 on sale in those days. Including the cost of firing up the oven, she calculated that it cost her about $1.29 to make a batch.

I had tried, semi-successfully and not so successfully, to replicate her bread a few times in the past, but I quickly learned that making bread truly is an art, and if you want to do it well, it takes a lot of practice.

So at Christmas a year ago, I had her walk me through it once again. And I went home and started to practice. By the time I had achieved a decent result, I was hooked.

It now costs me about $5 for the flour, thanks to inflation, but when you consider that buying the same loaves would cost me about $18 today, it's still a cheap way to enjoy good bread.

That's part of why I started making my own. I was tired of paying high retail prices for just so-so bread.

But the bigger reason was self-sufficiency. As part of my self-assigned preparations for a post-peak oil world, I wanted to be able to produce a decent loaf of bread starting with only the basics: flour, salt, yeast, and water. No electricity, no bread machines, no special ovens required. Just elbow grease and a little skill. (Our own metals investing guru, Greg McCoach, has actually taken it one step further, grinding his own flour from wheat to make his bread. I haven't tackled that one yet, but I will.)

Learning to rely on oneself was indeed one of the key themes of the Hemmingway novel alluded to in the title of this piece. And it's becoming an increasingly insistent theme in many aspects of our lives. King Arthur Flour, which is the brand that I and most home breadmakers use, has reported a lively increase in sales and interest as the price of wheat has soared.

The inflation of food prices is not only making headlines, particularly for prepared and packaged foods, but is also causing a growing unrest. Bread is, after all, the most basic of staples, and the poor--which is to say, much of the world--depend on it for a huge percentage of their daily sustenance.

A quick Google News search turned up these headlines in the first page of results, all from today:

Gaza Bakeries Strike Over Bread Prices

Bread Price to Increase [Fiji]

Ukraine Govt Plans Controls on Key Food Prices

The Bread is Rising... And May Explode [India]

Egyptian Bread Crisis Stirs Anger

Grain Prices Soar Globally

Part of the problem is that the Australian wheat harvest was meager, due to their ongoing drought. This increased demand for American wheat, and helped to push up its price.

In fact, global stockpiles of grain are now at their lowest levels ever. The world now has a mere 40 days of grain supply.

But there are other factors which have conspired to raise food prices across the board, including escalating energy costs, the falling dollar, and the increasing allocation of good grain-growing land to biofuel production. It has been estimated that on average, it takes 10 calories of energy input to bring one calorie of food to your table, and as we saw in part 2 of this series, the cost of that energy has been skyrocketing.

According to recent U.S. Labor Department statistics, food prices have gone up dramatically in the last year:

  • Milk: +17%
  • Cheese: +15%
  • Rice and pasta: +13%
  • Bread: +12%
  • Eggs: +62% percent in the past two years.

But the price of wheat is the most stunning of all. Prices have more than doubled over the last year, and tripled since the end of 2005:

wheat_futures_1999-2008.jpg

As if that weren't eye-popping enough, the volatility has been amazing too, with about a 20% variation in futures prices over the course of a single week:

 

wheat_futures_031008-031808.jpg

Such a fundamental inflationary threat to the productive base of the economy may finally put an end to the federal economists' little game of focusing on "core" price indexes, which exclude food and energy costs in order to come up with more optimistic numbers. So-called core wholesale prices jumped half a percent in February, more than double the forecast. To a hard-pressed worker just trying to get by, "excluding food and energy" is little more than a silly intellectual exercise.

Not only are food and energy closely interrelated, but weather is right in the mix too. The increasing use of fossil fuels contributes to global warming, which reduces food production, as was the case with the Australian wheat harvest. At the same time, weather impacts our ability to produce energy...and back around the wheel we go.

So let's take a look at the weather angle.

Weather

A report released a few weeks ago by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that the average temperature this winter was the lowest since 2001 for both the U.S. and the world. But higher than normal temps for the South and the Northeast helped to keep the overall energy demand about 1.7% under the average.

Some climate change deniers have used the moderating temperatures as grist for their mills, but the details tell a different story: Record snow at Alta, near Salt Lake City, and a snowpack measuring 150 of average across the West, yet about a third of the West still suffers from moderate to severe drought. Record precipitation in the Northeast and record snows in some parts of New England, but two-thirds of the Southeast continues to suffer extreme drought conditions, and the northern portion of the area, including central North Carolina, northern Georgia, and northern Alabama, continues to flirt with drought disaster (you may recall Nick Hodge's piece on Georgia's water crisis from February). From Florida to North Carolina, they're still parched.

All of this has affected energy. The severe cold weather in Asia and Europe has made them willing to pay more than double the price of the U.S. benchmark for LNG, which is expected to cut into the LNG imports that were anticipated by the U.S. In Canada, freezing January temperatures shut down the oil sands operations of Syncrude, the world's largest producer of synthetic crude, shaving 17% from its expected first quarter production. Colder temperatures have also contributed to the rising price of natural gas shipped to Europe.

Inflation is the Cruelest Tax

On the whole, events over the last year have really reinforced the theses that we at Angel Publishing have been putting forth. Our free newsletters, Wealth Daily, Energy and Capital, and Green Chip Stocks have all correctly predicted the important trends that are playing out today:

  • Increasing trouble for fossil fuel production, and growing confirmation of the near-peak oil thesis
  • Steadily rising fossil fueled energy costs
  • Increasing concern about greenhouse gas emissions and increasing political support for their control
  • Steadily decreasing costs of renewables and increasing public support
  • Economic fallout from unsustainable business practices
  • Growing awareness of the bigger issues entwined with the energy crisis, like environmental overshoot, unsustainable population levels, climate change, food and water shortages, and so on.

Yet, there's little satisfaction in being right about what's wrong. Beyond being futurists and chroniclers of the unfolding crisis, we are also continually reminded that we have a responsibility to help find the profitable paths forward.

And those paths are inextricably interwoven. Everything affects everything else, and with every passing year, the world becomes more global in everything we do.

China's coal soot winds up polluting the West Coast, but their soot is largely driven by America's demand for their goods. America's thirst for oil has inextricably enmeshed her in the Middle East, but the terrorist backlash has changed us forever and continues to threaten our civil liberties and our geopolitical goodwill.

It also threatens our economic health. The five-year-old war in Iraq has now cost us $600 billion by the Pentagon's own conservative estimate, and will cost $3 trillion by Nobel-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz's more comprehensive estimate. Consider this: $3 trillion is enough to buy all of the U.S.'s oil consumption (21 million barrels per day) at a retail price of $100/bbl for four years.

But that's actually double-counting, because the DoD is the world's largest single consumer of oil, by far. Without the war, we'd be burning a lot less oil. So in reality, the cost of the war might cover all of the U.S.'s oil consumption for the last five years or more.

And yet it has not only failed to buy us energy security, it has actually made the situation worse, by driving up the cost of everything, draining our economic lifeblood, and ultimately funding those who oppose us.

As the adage goes, inflation is the cruelest tax, because it hurts the poor and middle-classes the most. What's worse, between inflation and the direct war costs, they're paying for this misbegotten adventure twice. In turn, the increasing costs of living will make it more difficult for them to service their debts, particularly their mortgages, which will further undermine the economy.

And our amazing growth in recent decades has come with a very high cost to our health and that of the whole environment.

We are truly all in this together, and more of us realize it every day. Peak oil, global warming, foreign policy, fiscal issues, water, food...all just different sides of the same human dilemma. We will have to make some difficult tradeoffs and tough decisions in the years ahead. I pity da fool who winds up serving the next term in the White House.

All the while, though, I'm going to be right here, on the pages of Energy and Capital and The $20 Trillion Report, to bring you the straight dope, and show you how to survive and thrive in these troubling times.

At the very least, it's going to be one helluva ride.

Until next time,

Chris Nelder

Energy and Capital


"Energy stocks... The only way a human is going to make any money."

-- Matt Simmons, Peak Oil's first and most vocal proponent,
and founder of the country's last pure play energy investment banking firm.

Follow the money trail. Sign up for Energy and Capital now.

Enter Your E-mail Address Below:


By signing up, you'll also get our latest report, The Truth About Oil.





Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (15 votes)

Comment on this Article  |   Digg this | Post to del.icio.us | Reddit


Comments:

Comment by Mike B on 2008-04-04
"We will have to make some difficult tradeoffs "


Might elimination of "Corporations"
be part of the answer ?

Comment by Javan Reid on 2008-04-04
Mr. Nelder,
You said it all. Siting Stiglitz and noting the biggest cause of our problems--the occupation of Iraq without a plan--is the kind of analysis that shows a grasp of reality.

Comment by n.i.cockayne on 2008-04-03
have google at nova/the dimming sun. There is a side show about the grounding of aircraft in the U.S.A. on 9/11 and the realization of the effects of particulate matter on the sun's energy hitting the surface of the planet. This connects to grain reserves.

The planet is challanged by too many people. Think back to the Rio world conference and the foolish rejection of talk of population planning. Today farmers and ranchers can monitor by satellite how many animals to run on a given section of land, and what the land requires to be fully fertile but we are unwilling to tailor our human population to our fragile planet. your thoughts please.

Comment by Mike on 2008-04-03
All good stuff, but just a warning about global warming: the science is not all in, and the science that is still coming in doesn't support the Al Gore and IPCC view of global warming[*]. Global Warming is more political than scientific. The greater likelihood is that the Earth will be entering a rather nasty extended cold period in a few years' time. Enjoy the warm weather while it lasts, and consider this : if a warm climate is a threat to food production and fuel prices, just think what a cold climate would be like.
We're going to look back rather fondly on this warm period!
[*]Email me I'll send you info - small in quantity.

Comment by Joyce Procacci on 2008-04-03
Chris Nelder has written one of the best reflections on our interwoven financial predicament. His personal approach reveals a sensitivity to the ongoing broad costs to humanity which I have not found in financial newsletters. It was a great read. Please have him order me a loaf of his homemade bread.

Gracious good thanks.

Former bread maker soon to re-up,
J. Procacci

Comment by Dieter on 2008-04-03
1. It is not only wheat that is in short supply:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/CB6E8E48-C288-4066-90B8-8F23DFDCDFEE.htm

2. Milling your own flour is not (only) an act of self sufficiency. Vitamins and other essentials are best conserved in the whole grain. Once milled they have a tendency to oxidize in the flour.

3. This article once again confirms my view of many years: We do not have an energy problem, we do not have a pollution problem, we do not have a food problem. We have one and one problem only and that is that of a world overpopulation.

This is why I would propose the Chines Government for the Peace Nobel Price for their one child family policy. By their own account that has relieved the earth from 300 million additional Chinese by now. Everything else around China is collateral damage.

Dieter

Comment by Douglas Stark on 2008-04-03
outstanding

Comment by Jeff on 2008-04-03
It's a huge price to pay to force more wealth to the very top of the economic ladder, no?
Peace is more profitable, and to more people.

Comment by Grover C. Ellisor on 2008-04-03
This is a very poor article which reveals Mr. Nelder's failure to understand climate change and the fantasy that Al Gore and his fellow profiteers have spun around the junk science which is required to support their notion that the minor greenhouse gas, CO2, has caused the temperature to rise. Water vapor constitutes 95% of the greenhouse gases and is produced by nature itself. The only thing worse is the solution of the U.S. senate for the real energy crisis we have which is to raise more corn. Americans will play a steep price indeed for listening to and believing the environmentalist activists who don't understand or really give a hoot about the environment. These activists have an agenda which is to socialize America, but they need a lot of us to believe their trash and help them along. If you like $5.00 gasoline and higher, keep listening to them and for goodness sake don't allow drilling on our sacred public lands where we might find and produce some of our own oil and gas. GCE

Comment by Doug Browder on 2008-04-03
I am sorry that you have bought into the hoax that mankind has any significant effect on climate change. Even though the mainstream media and Algore's acolytes continue to push this fiction, there is plenty of legitimate and expert countering information that never gets any exposure. If you have an interest in fact rather than relgion, here is a link to get you started: Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT.

http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2006/08/30/mits_inconvenient_scientist/