Rate:
Share
Views: 1703
Text Size:

Oil Exporters and Renewable Energy

Passing the Cleantech Tipping Point

By Nick Hodge
Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Forget far-off forecasts for a minute; let's look at the here and now.

The fact of the energy matter is that cleantech has passed the tipping point.

Talk about T. Boone's wind failure and the global warming hoax all you want. I'll talk about renewable energy.

And apparently so will everyone else, from the president of the Untied States to president of Greenpeace to the president of the United Arab Emirates.

The past year has been a groundswell for renewable energy, even in the face of recession. If anything, global economic turmoil has highlighted the impact clean energy will have on future economies. . . and the willingness of global governments to usher in that future.

Countries in all corners of the world have turned to cleantech, not just for the kilowatt-hours but also for the jobs and related investment it brings with it.

Even China — the environmental abstainer of abstainers — recently announced their plan to spend $290 billion on clean energy in the next decade.

But perhaps the most convincing evidence that cleantech is here to stay is the willingness of stalwart oil nations to adopt the technology. If the countries that control the world's largest oil reserves are rapidly deploying renewables, what makes anyone think we can drill, baby, drill our way out of looming energy problems?

Biggest Oil Is Going Green

Perhaps you missed it, but here's how Reuters introduced the story: "Speedy electric cars will soon compete with gas-guzzling SUVs on Abu Dhabi streets as the oil-exporting emirate buys into alternative energy."

Aren't those guys swimming in oil?

Perhaps. But unlike some energy neophytes, they understand that it's a dwindling resource, and that the time to begin a smooth transition to other fuels is now.

It's not about emissions. It's not about global warming (can it get much hotter there?). It's about energy security. And large oil-exporting nations are increasingly turning to renewables to get it.

Shouldn't we — being 60% dependent on foreign oil — be doing the same? I mean, these guys are the third-largest exporter of oil in the world. And yet they're salivating over cleantech.

It's a wake-up call if there ever was one.

The news this week is that Aabar, an investment company wholly owned by the Abu Dhabi government, has taken a 4% stake in Tesla, the U.S.-based electric vehicle manufacturer.

Hmmmm. Why would this oil-rich nation go after alternative transportation before alternative electricity? Can you say 'secretly dwindling reserves'?

And electric vehicles are just the beginning of their investments. According to the Chairman of Aabar, this is just one of several more planned ventures into clean technology.

But here's the real kicker: they're using revenue from oil sales to do it.

If Microsoft was using profits to invest in Apple, it would be a clear sign of a shift in power in a major industry. . . and a clear indication of a giant's brooding demise.

This is the same thing, only we're dealing with trillion-dollar global energy markets.

Reuters called it "no small paradox."

I call it the new energy reality.

Advertisement

Americans Are Junkies

Oil junkies, to be precise.

And our dealer, the Middle East, has been making a fortune off our habit.

But the table is about to be turned.

Oil Sheiks have already begun protecting their massive oil wealth. And as they do, American investors have a chance to walk away with fistfuls of cash.

Click here to learn about the secret revenge trade that could make you rich while the Middle East watches their last bit of oil disappear.


Writing on the Wall

Quite frankly, you must've been living in a hole if didn't see this coming. Here at Energy & Capital, we've been touting the end of cheap oil for years.

And we're seeing it all play out right now, albeit with a brief recessionary reprieve.

In addition to the Tesla venture, Abu Dhabi has also invested $22 billion to build the world's first entirely renewably powered city called Masdar.

According to its website, "It represents Abu Dhabi's multi-faceted response to the challenges facing a sustainable future. The Masdar Initiative is positioning Abu Dhabi as a global leader and hub for the research and development of renewable energy and sustainable technology."

These guys already control gobs of precious oil because of their fortunate geographic location. They know that party's coming to an end, so they're rapidly pursuing geographically agnostic clean technologies.

As humans and investors, we should be doing the same.

The country even lobbied hard and successfully to be home to the 150-nation International Renewable Energy Agency. They won the bid last month.

So, now we have the United Arab Emirates, third-largest oil exporter and home to the International Renewable Energy Agency.

We'd better step up to the plate.

It should make you wonder: if oil-rich nations are gung-ho for renewables, why is it such a contentious debate here, where we're not even close to being able to supply our own energy habit?

I'd have to say it's because of politics and sheeple, since the problem has been clearly identified (peak oil), and the solutions are becoming readily available.

So, while we've been talking about a tipping point for some time, I'd have to say we've squarely passed it.

Yes, we still need coal. Yes, we still need oil. Yes, we still need natural gas.

But, it's not mutually exclusive to profit from and support both traditional and clean energy technologies.

Accepting that fact is the only thing keeping us from a secure energy future.

Call it like you see it,



Nick

P.S. If you're still on the fence about investing in renewable energy, now is the time to take the plunge. And you can have an expert guiding you every step of the way. Take a few minutes to read about the next profit play of the Alternative Energy Speculator. At the very least, you can try it risk free for 30-days, but I'm convinced you'll stick around much longer.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (13 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by J Ashley Neal on 2009-07-15
Makes sense to me...HOWEVER...the
E's are doing it out of intelligent
choice...I don't want a forced "trade for my cap" !!
Comment by Hazel Henderson on 2009-07-15
Nick : you are right on ! Another case in point: the DESERTEC group of 12 companies led by ABB and Munich Re to invest in a string of solar concentrator plants along the Sahara and bring the power over DC lines to meet 15% of EU's electricity needs. And the Climate Prosperity Alliance reversing the cost-to-fossil-fuel-sectors logic of mitigation to the savings , benefits and revenues from investing in rapid ramping up of the post-carbon economy ( see www.EthicalMarkets.com click on Climate Prosperity Funds).We enjoy your Newsletter ! Hazel
Comment by Anthony Tumminello on 2009-07-15
Different take. Abu Dahbi looking for income. They use renewables at home because their oil will bring increasing wealth from others. They invest in renewables here because our government is pouring in money.

You state that use of renewables and oil, coal, and NG is not mutually exclusive. Why doesn't our government see this? We could drill for our own oil, create jobs, reduce dependence on foreign oil and use taxes from drilling and jobs to fund renewables instead of stopping use of oil or making it so expensive that we have to either continue to buy from Abu Dahbi or ride bikes or walk. This government doesn't care about clean air, only more money and power. Otherwise they would not support converting a vital resource such as food to a corrosive, expensive fuel such as ethanol which creates more Co2 in manufacture and wastes water and resources.
Comment by Jim on 2009-07-15
Decisions can be made more swiftly and surely in a monarchy, oligacrchy or dictatorship, than in a representative democracy. We Americans first need to have a terrible crisis, unlimited special interest pleading and political posturing, trying everything else, before finally doing what makes good sense for our nation, even if that means that each of us has to give up something we have to get something better. We have forgotten that we are all one people who are in this together.
Comment by Banish on 2009-07-15
The only reason GE, Duke Energy, P&G & Goldman Sacks et.el. are investing or supporting so called green energy is so they can trade carbon credits and make millions!90% of all wind turbines & solar panels are made over seas! Indiana just bought all their turbines from Denmark. And according to reports Europe lost 2.5 manufacturing jobs for each green job created! Go Figure!Electric & hydrogen cars are many years away from being practical! As for the smart grid fine as long as they can't set my thermostat. Banish
Comment by Richard on 2009-07-15
where will they get the electicity to charge up the cars from ?
Comment by Ed LeLouis on 2009-07-15
Dream on - the technology is not here on a commercial scale. Oil & gas will be our primary source of energy for many years to come.
Comment by Chuck S on 2009-07-15
I heard that Obama, etc are giving Tesla some HUGE amount of US tax subsidy. That may be all that UAE is after.
I wonder if there's some subsidies from the US or UN to UAE. Renewables are generally very impractical without huge subsidies. It takes a lot of fossel fuel to make renewables. Copper, iron, etc ore has to be dug out of the ground, shipped to a refiner and formed into wind generators, towers, etc. They then have to be shipped and installed. Extensive transmission lines and backup generators have to be built for wind generators. Solar needs at least a backup generator.

Maybe UAE has a favorable situation - probably solar is better there, but I doubt if enough. Maybe they're foolish like I think Boone Pickens (and Obabma and many other polititicans) may have been to not realize all the costs. Maybe Boone Pickens expected the government to build the transmission lines.


The last I heard, we have maybe 10 billion barrels in Alaska, 85 offshore, 300 in the Baaken formation in North Dakota, and more than 1 trillion in oil shale. Much of this is off limits by the Democrats and a few turncoat Republicans.

When complaining about foreign oil, why do so few say "let's get more of our own oil"?
Comment by Chuck S on 2009-07-15
I heard that Obama, etc are giving Tesla some HUGE amount of US tax subsidy. That may be all that UAE is after.
I wonder if there's some subsidies from the US or UN to UAE. Renewables are generally very impractical without huge subsidies. It takes a lot of fossel fuel to make renewables. Copper, iron, etc ore has to be dug out of the ground, shipped to a refiner and formed into wind generators, towers, etc. They then have to be shipped and installed. Extensive transmission lines and backup generators have to be built for wind generators. Solar needs at least a backup generator.

Maybe UAE has a favorable situation - probably solar is better there, but I doubt if enough. Maybe they're foolish like I think Boone Pickens (and Obabma and many other polititicans) may have been to not realize all the costs. Maybe Boone Pickens expected the government to build the transmission lines.


The last I heard, we have maybe 10 billion barrels in Alaska, 85 offshore, 300 in the Baaken formation in North Dakota, and more than 1 trillion in oil shale. Much of this is off limits by the Democrats and a few turncoat Republicans.

When complaining about foreign oil, why do so few say "let's get more of our own oil"?
Comment by doug nottage on 2009-07-15
Sorry, this is not directly related to the article but is related to big players having a belief in dwindling oil. Have you noticed in the news that Shell is selling ALL of its filling stations here in New Zealand? AND its substantial share in our only refinery? Hmmmm
Comment by hoebert on 2009-07-16
Nick is absolutely right. There is no time to loose for making inroads in alternative energy.
Much to my regret the majority of Americans is more interested to indulge in discussions about the mom-type jeans president Obama seems to be wearing when leisurely throwing a baseball or like on CNN where analysts are pondering and weighing every single word of the hearing of Sotomayor or the committee as if there are no more important things on earth!
It is a sad conclusion but most people are far less farsighted than Nick and go for sensation and gossip rather than the real things.
Comment by Leeb Group on 2009-07-16
As the scarcity of oil becomes paramount and oil reaches $200 a barrel, the U.S. government will find its reserves and alternative energy sources entirely insufficient to deal with the crisis. National oil companies already control between 80 and 90 percent of the world’s oil reserves, and this number is climbing fast. It’s interesting to note that the countries which control more and more of the world’s oil resources are also those investing massive amounts of capital in alternative energies. The U.S., which relies on others for much of its energy needs, has allocated a mere $19 billion for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in 2009. It’s a start, but will likely not make a meaningful dent – as we need hundreds of billions in investment. –www.leeb.com