Rate:
Share
Views: 16660
Text Size:

High Gasoline Prices Are Here to Stay

Debunking the Myths about High Gas Prices

By Chris Nelder
Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

This Earth Day was a watershed moment.

I've never seen so many Earth Day pronouncements, celebrations and headlines. The world has never been so focused on energy and sustainability as it is now.

This Earth Day, benchmark West Texas Intermediate oil set a new all-time high over $119, and Tapis (the Malaysian benchmark price Far East crude) shot over $124.

Gasoline prices crossed $3.50 a gallon for the first time, and diesel set a new record over $4.20.

A front page story on the Wall Street Journal declared "the age of cheap and easily pumped oil is over," and followed up with several stories about a new crop of suburban farmers who are making their first forays into self-sufficiency. In my book, there's really no better way to celebrate Earth Day than to plant some of your own food.

Best of all, I got the word that my new book about peak oil (and gas, coal, nuclear, and all renewables), Profit from the Peak with Brian Hicks, is flying up the Amazon charts—and it only just started shipping. The actual release date is still 10 days off, but it was already #1 in some subcategories and at one point was #792 of all sales-ranked books on Amazon.

Five years ago, I was one of the few lone voices out in the wilderness warning about peak oil, and all that it means. Oil had hit a new high around $35 and most traders were arguing that it would soon fall back to $20.

Peak oil was considered a fringe theory, and the financial media were absolutely sure that the market would sort everything out and let us all get back to our "Happy Motoring" fantasies. I had some spirited discussions with investment analysts back then, who basically thought that I just had an apocalyptic bent.

I stuck to my guns. I knew that oil had begun a relentless rise as we approached the global peak of production, and that the Street was in for a rude awakening. And at the end of last year, I predicted that 2008 would be the year that peak oil really hit the mainstream, and the dialogue about energy would start to come around to reality.

Now, as oil hits record high after record high, the Street's own paper of record has admitted that the jig is up. The whole world is finally starting to recognize that we've got a serious problem on our hands, and no amount of "jaw-boning" the Saudis is gonna fix it.

The Oil Price Juggernaut

Maybe the change in attitude had to do with hearing it straight from King Abdullah himself, who said last week that he wasn't interested in increasing Saudi production beyond its current level just to satisfy the rapacious demand of Western consumers.

He's got his own country's future to think about. "When there were some new finds, I told them, 'no, leave it in the ground, with grace from god, our children need it,'" he said.

One week later, U.S. Energy Secretary Sam Bodman admitted that he was powerless to persuade them otherwise. "I have done everything that I know how to do with OPEC," he said. "I have a very good relationship with (Saudi oil minister A) Naimi and all the people that work at OPEC. I wish they would open it up and issue more oil. That's my wish but I can't order them to."

Bodman's admission comes about a month after the White House admitted that it, too, was powerless over the situation. On March 13, while being grilled about high gasoline prices, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said "It would be wrong of the President to provide false hope to people to think that we are going to be able to have an immediate impact to reduce gas prices...This problem didn't get started overnight, and it's not going to be solved overnight... This is something we're going to have to all work through."

Energy expert Frank Verrastro at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington agreed: "Clearly, there are no easy, near term fixes for higher gas prices."

I'd like to tell Mr. Verrastro that there are no easy long term fixes, either. But I suspect he already knows that. He's just too polite to say so.

Myths About High Gas Prices

So why are gasoline prices so high?

Well, consider this: In general, a $1 rise in the price of a barrel of crude oil adds about 2.4 cents to the price of a gallon of gasoline. Since oil prices have doubled since the beginning of 2007, you had to expect gasoline prices to follow.

Of course, the story is a little more complex than that. As my readers know, the factors that weigh on gasoline and oil prices are many and interrelated. But you'd never know it from most of the media coverage. In fact, I have heard and read more myth than fact about gasoline prices.

It's an annual phenomenon. Every year, as gasoline prices rise from their winter lows, we gather to wring our hands and wonder and worry what's going on. As if we'd never seen this happen before.

I just realized that I was on exactly the same topic, talking about Congress doing the same stupid things, one year ago.

I even got the annual email petition to boycott gasoline purchases from Exxon. Yep, I wrote about that one year ago too.

The outrage over gas prices is as regular as Groundhog Day.

Let's debunk this story and see if we can't get it right, for once.

1. It's Those Evil Oil Companies

Every time oil prices spike up into a new trading range, you can bet that some Congressman will haul Big Oil's CEOs into a hearing and try to pin the blame on them. And this time is no different.

The lack of understanding of the oil markets demonstrated by our fearless leaders is truly appalling.

As ConocoPhillips Chief Executive James Mulva remarked one year ago, "Big Oil is not so big."

My readers know the real score: Big Oil controls only about 10% (at best) of the world's remaining oil reserves, and their share of daily production is slowly eroding. They have reached the point where the oil they produce is coming out of their total reserves, because they can't replenish it with new-found oil anymore.

As we have discussed in these pages previously, since the very basis for the valuation of their companies is the inexorably falling reserves, big oil companies are doing the smart thing and buying back their shares. Wouldn't you, if the alternative was to continue investing skyrocketing amounts of money in order to drill dry holes in decreasingly interesting prospects?

Personally, I wish they'd be a little more up-front about that, but if you follow their actions and not their words, it's clear enough.

But I digress...

Investigation after investigation into alleged oil company profiteering hasn't resulted in one single prosecutable charge. It's simply barking up the wrong tree.

Remember: Oil is highly fungible. Oil is traded on a global basis. And while Big Oil does benefit from higher prices for their diminishing barrels, they're not setting prices.

Traders are, and speculation has been heavy. The amount of oil traded on paper far exceeds the amount of oil that's actually being sold.

This has prompted more Congressional attention, and questions as to whether the rules for oil trading need to be tightened to keep out speculators.

That may be a good call actually, but for now, the increasing price of oil remains partly due to the flight to commodities, which I have written about in recent columns.

That said, I think that oil is still badly underpriced on the basis of its true value. So the speculation may in fact be a part of a normal market, functioning as it should to find the correct price.

So: speculators, a qualified yes; Big Oil, not really.

2. It's the Low Refinery Output

Some have blamed high gasoline prices on low refinery output. After all, lower supply means higher prices, right?

Well...not exactly.

If you think gasoline prices are high now, consider this.

A year ago, the typical "crack spread," or the profit on refining a barrel of oil, was over $20 a barrel, and peaked at over $30. Today, it's closer to $10 on average, and for the independent refiners, it's absolutely dismal:

crack spread chart

Source: PetroStrategies, using Oil & Gas Journal statistics

Consequently, refinery utilization has been even lower than usual for this time of year, the "turnaround season" when refiners typically idle some equipment in order to prepare to produce the summer blends of gasoline. Normally, refinery utilization in the turnaround season is in the range of 85-90%, but this year it's barely above 80%.

So why have refining profits collapsed?

It's a squeeze play: Crude prices have gone up much more than gasoline prices for domestic refiners, squeezing out their profit.

So why have gasoline prices not kept up with crude?

Part of the answer is reduced domestic demand. High gasoline prices are really starting to hurt American consumers, and they're cutting back on their trips. Still, although gasoline consumption has fallen by a few percent year over year, total U.S. demand will still rise about a half a percent this year.

The problem here is that the elasticity of U.S. gasoline demand is really very low. Recent studies have suggested that a quadrupling of gasoline price only cuts demand by half, and that only 20% of the demand reduction is due to driving less—the rest owes to reduced vehicle ownership and better mpg.

But the bigger part of the answer owes to a new dynamic in the gasoline trade: Finished gasoline imports have increased dramatically in the last several years, which has pressured prices for the domestic refiners.

This is primarily because Europe is increasingly choosing diesel over gasoline. Their diesel-sipping vehicles are more efficient and generate less emissions. As their diesel demand rises, they have more finished gasoline to export to a hungry world market.

Were this not the case, gasoline prices in the U.S. would have risen as fast as diesel. Diesel prices have gone up twice as much as gasoline prices over the last year:

EIA gas and diesel prices

Source: EIA

You might be surprised to know where all that imported gasoline is coming from. It's a very different list than our sources of crude:

Top 10 Sources U.S. Gasoline Imports, 2007 (million barrels)

1.

United Kingdom

25.1

2.

U.S. Virgin Islands

23.6

3.

France

11.2

4.

Canada

10.6

5.

Netherlands

10.5

6.

Norway

8.4

7.

Germany

8.4

8.

Russia

7.4

9.

Italy

7.2

10.

OPEC Countries

5.5

Source: EIA

So instead of blaming domestic refining output for tight supply and high gasoline prices, we should be thanking Europe for reducing their gasoline demand!

As we head into the "summer driving season," with its higher demand and its requirements for specialized blends of gasoline, it seems likely to me that margins will head back into normal territory for this time of year.

If we revisit last year's crack spread highs, gasoline prices could tack on another 48 to 72 cents per gallon!

That's why I've been predicting $4 gas by summer.

3. It's Our Failure to Develop Domestic Supply

This is one of my favorites: the claim that if only those damn environmentalists hadn't made much of our offshore oil reserves off limits to drilling, that we'd be enjoying gas prices under $2 again.

These people demonstrate a severe lack of comprehension about the concept of flow rates.

This is a familiar concept to my regular readers. All together now: "It's not the size of the tank which matters, but the size of the tap."

When you're consuming 21 million barrels a day (mbpd) of oil, bringing on a few field, even a "huge" field producing a quarter million or a half million barrels a day is still a drop in the bucket. It might dampen the rate at which prices increase, but it can't bring them down.

If you understand what Hubbert's Peak is all about (and if you don't, you definitely should read my book!), you know that there is no turning back the clock on the decline of U.S. oil output, which has been steadily falling for 37 years despite massive investment and the best technology in the world.

4. It's Because They Won't Open the SPR

Finally, we have the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), which was created as a supply buffer against disruptions like the oil shock of 1973-4. It was a fine idea. I remember sitting in line in a car for three hours in the hot summer Tucson sun, waiting to buy a maximum of five gallons of overpriced gas on an "even" or "odd" day. It sucked.

The SPR can't buffer prices, though. It's strictly an emergency supply. Right now, it's got about 701 million barrels of oil in it, which sounds like a lot. But when you're consuming 21 mbpd, that's only a 33 day supply. More correctly, it's a 58 day supply, since we import only 12 mbpd of the 21 we consume.

Two months isn't much of a buffer against a serious emergency, and in today's environment, we absolutely must be prepared for such an event. It's an insurance policy against natural disasters and oil terrorism. We need look no further than what happened to oil after 9/11 and Katrina to know how quickly oil prices can spike up. To draw the SPR down below current levels would be irresponsible and reckless. That's why I applauded the decision last year to increase the SPR's capacity.

More to the point, the maximum flow rate of the SPR is only 4.4 mbpd, so at most it could only provide about 20% of our daily needs. That would dampen oil prices only a little, and only for a short while, until we had to start refilling it again. And when we did, it would add substantially to the already stretched global supply-demand balance, making price pressure even worse.

The Bottom Line on Gasoline Prices

I have written at length about why oil prices keep going higher. Some of it has to do with the usual factors cited in the press: speculation, geopolitical unrest, OPEC announcements, inventory levels, and so on.

But the most important reason usually goes unsaid: peak oil.

Even the IMF has obliquely admitted there is a problem. Recently, deputy director John Lipsky said, "While oil demand has remained robust, the supply side response to rising prices has been disappointing."

And that's the bottom line right there.

You know the old saw: when you point the finger at somebody else, there are three pointing back at you.

While oil production has leveled off, demand has not, and the reduced demand from the OECD is being more than offset by the red-hot economies of the developing world.

For the first time this year, the combined oil consumption of China, India, Russia and the Middle East will exceed that of the U.S.. Even with all our efforts to curb domestic demand, worldwide oil demand will increase about 2 percent this year, according to the IEA.

Until global demand cools off, there's no way out of the oil price trap.

And however we choose to characterize the reasons, oil supply isn't increasing anymore. The tap is wide open.

As Scotty used to say on Star Trek, "She can't take anymore cap'n! I'm givin' ‘er all she's got!"

The world is now perched precariously on the plateau at the top of the global peak in oil production. And it's not a long plateau. We've been on it for about three years, and I'm giving it another two years, tops. After that, we head on down the other side of Hubbert's Peak.

And I am increasingly doubtful that the world will be able to reduce its demand in time to prepare for the second half of the Age of Oil.

Oil will keep going higher, and gasoline and diesel prices will follow it up—not precisely, and not immediately, but they will follow. And for once, the White House seems to have told the truth about energy:

There's really very little we can do about it.

Well, except for this: You can sign up for the $20 Trillion Report and learn how to profit from the increasing price of precious black gold. Your gains there should more than make up for your pain at the pump.

Until next time,

Chris Nelder

—Chris






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (39 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Tim Troxler on 2008-04-24
You stated in this article and in at least one other article in the past about the phenomenon of oil companies buying back their shares, that it is a sign that they are recognizing the end of oil exploration and production as a worthwhile investment. I posted on an MSN Money board about Exxon doing this. A whole chorus chimed in that this is a sign that a company is INVESTING in its infrastructure. I'll admit my business knowledge is weak, but how do you explain this?
Comment by Bill Cassidy on 2008-04-24
you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth. low refinery, crude inventory, Then you state the Balken reserve of 503 million barrels of Oil at $16.00 a barrel. is it there or not,a top Chevron Chemist says this, stop by one day on chevron & it will hurt there profits, stop for one week,& prices will fall by $2.00 a gallon,now is the time to boycott Chevron / Exxon. before the country falls into a Depression, which if truth be told we are already in.come on tell the truth don't beat around the Bush. & Pres. Bush is a Oil man, what does he care about the common man, give me a break.
Comment by Rob Grant on 2008-04-24
I fly a RC helicopter with a video camera mounted on it for photo and survey work. It is electric powered, why are we not driving electric cars, because Corp America does not want us to, not yet. There is too much money to be made in the Oil Industry. Now that the marriage between the auto industry and the oil industry has broken up we will see the plug-in hybrid and Hydrogen powered cars in our near future. As you have written in the past these modes of power are not conducive to Tax(big oil entitlement programs) and the government is nothing but how to tax. AS WE SEE THE ECONOMY TANK DO WE SEE ANY BELT TIGHTENING IN WASHINGTON, LIP SERVICE ONLY.
Comment by hema mahesh on 2008-04-24
THIS WAS A GOOD A ARTICLE I HOPE YOU SEND MORE ARTICLE LIKE THIS
Comment by G M SCHERR on 2008-04-24
WHAT ABOUT THE OUTRAGEOUS BIG OIL PROFITS? THOSE PROFITS ARE COMING FROM OUR POCKETBOOKS!!!! IF THEY DID NOT GOUGE THE PUBLIC WITH THEIR OUTRAGEOUS PROFITS THE GAS PRICE COULD BE MORE REASONABLE, NOT $2 BUT NOT $4 EITHER.
Comment by Randall Hart on 2008-04-24
I still don't agree with your assessment of the oil calamity. We American's can control our flow rate if the nation makes it a priority to do so. Yes, that means the expenditure of major capital and lord forbid, more jobs, to ramp up (our) flow rate capacity, refinining utilization, transportation, pipelines and everything else associated with a move of this type. We can do it though, but people in power have to package it and sell it and make it a National Strategic Objective to do so. If we would only focus on America's needs and less on the worlds needs, we can put this subject into the proper perspective. Screw the foriegners and their oil / gas, lets worry about the needs of this country when it comes to the basics.

At the same time were making a full scale frontal attack, ramping up oil flow rates and production domestically, we should keep pounding away on alternative energy sources and options to decrease the overall footprint for oil for the long haul.



Randy Hart
Comment by Jack Hollis on 2008-04-24
This is the third time in my lifetime that we have had peak oil. Your article is nothing but a bunch of BS meant to droive up the price of energy.The easiest way to lower the price of gas and oil is to take George Soros out of the equation. Soros and a couple of his Democratic billionaire friends started up on the price of high gasoline back in 2004 when his tried to get John Kerry elected President. By shorting the dollar and bidding up oil prices since then, Soros and Co. have tried to wreck the US economy big time. It's the only way that he can get the American people to vote in a Democrat to the Whitehouse this fall. If Obama is elected President, gasoline prices will fall like a rock. The article you write about peak oil sounds like you are a tool of George Soros.
Comment by Michael Tomarelli on 2008-04-24
Chris,
"Five years ago, I was one of the few lone voices out in the wilderness warning about peak oil, and all that it means. Oil had hit a new high around $35"

Oil was at $38/bbl over twenty five years ago circa 1980-82. DeForester made elabrorate models and forcasts about peak everything in the '50's or so.

Not that this changes the jist of what you are saying. But know that history now remembers DeForester as a discredited alarmists.


There are still huge amounts of petroleum, but at what price? It is economics (with some help from the awakening of the populus concerning CO2)that will fuel the switch to green energy.

'It is hard to be humble when you are making money.'

I am on your side,
Michael Tomarelli
Comment by Sigmund Silber on 2008-04-24
One problem the peak oil theory has run into is the truly ignorant contention by the author of that theory that production peaks when one half of the available resource has been extracted. That is a truly stunning contention with no basis in fact and apparently the author of todays article shares that ignorant contention.

I was VP of planning for a major natural resources company and spent many years studying commodity prices and for sure that geometry assumption is totally ignorant.

We may be at peak oil if you define oil in a very limited manner. We are certainly not at peak liquid energy. One has to look at the shape of the supply and demand curves to try to understand where the price is going.

In the meantime, idiots will use the peak oil scare to sell their rags which I guess makes them not idiots but rather the readers of their nonsense.
Comment by Alexander McNeilly on 2008-04-24
Regardless of where the sourse of today's greed is generated from, it eventually will make the Great Depession of the Twenties and Thirties look like a boom time.
More and more of America's Industry is being shipped overseas. In Michigan alone, the unemployment rate has reached 7.4% and heading higher by the month.
I am reminded of the story of the greedy teamster who was given the gift of a magnificent horse, it was strong and sound in limb and could pull the heaviest loads without tiring. To do the job, the greedy teamster was told by the donor (The Founders of the United States) that the horse would require two bales of hay and a small sack of oats every day. A few months passed and the hoggish teamster thought, "I'm going to try cutting down on the food". So the daily ration was then cut to a bale and a half of hay and three quarters of a sack of oats.
Everything seemed to be as it always was, the horse still pulled the heavy loads.
Month by month the feed was reduced, and still the horse did its work. "This is wonderful!", said the greedy teamster, "It would appear that I don't need to feed the horse anything and it'll still be able to do the work". So nothing was fed to the horse that had become nothing more that skin and bone, but still with a brave and willing heart it pulled the loads. Finally, what once had been a truly magnificent beast was harnessed up ready to pull its usual heavy load, after taking a few steps it collapsed and died.

Eventually when Americans can no longer afford to purchase the cheap items from China or the "services" from India, those Countries will fall even faster into the Abyss. Having tasted the "good life" even for a short period, there will be riots and revolution such as the World has never seen when it is taken from them.
At present we are being marshaled into line like lemmings preparing to march to our doom at the drumbeat of the wacko environmentalists who are always standing in the background, but never in the lead.
The World is awash in oil, yet we have millions, perhaps billions facing death by starvation within five years simply because grain is being used as fuel instead of food.
Come to think of it, perhaps that's what the nutty environmentalist's plan is REALLY all about, they say that the World is overpopulated.
Comment by Jim Word on 2008-04-24
Great summary, probably the best I've seen.. Jim
Comment by Michael Tomarelli on 2008-04-24
'Studying history yields great insite into the future.'


Assessing the Threat of Mineral Depletion
John E. Tilton
Colorado School of Mines

The sharp rise in mineral use has revived concern about scarcity. John Tilton responds by analyzing recent trends in the consumption and availability of minerals that are most integral to the needs of modern civilization. He reminds readers that the story of minerals scarcity is almost as old as human history - and so too is substitution and technological innovation. The issue at hand is the unprecedented acceleration in mineral exploitation and use. Given global population growth, rising living standards, and environmental concerns, how seriously should we take the threat of mineral exhaustion? "On Borrowed Time?" provides general interest and student readers with an accessible framework for understanding scarcity. Tilton defines concepts and explores the methods used to study mineral scarcity, including physical measures of known reserves and the total resource base, and economic measures, such as extraction and end-user costs. He notes the increasing emphasis on the social and environmental costs of mineral production and use, placing the scarcity debate in context of broader concerns about sustainability and equity. He adds a history of thought about scarcity, from Malthus and Ricardo to Harold Hotelling, Donella Meadows, and present-day writers. Tilton finds that, despite a century of rapid economic and population growth, the availability of important minerals has not declined. He is optimistic, yet cautious about extrapolation. He does not say that we will always innovate, substitute, or conserve our way out of scarcity. His intent is to provide readers with a way of thinking about scarcity, not a set of smug conclusions. Lukk


Biografi
John E. Tilton is Coulter Professor of Mineral Economics at the Colorado School of Mines. His other books include World Metal Demand and Mining and the Environment.
Comment by roger on 2008-04-24
One of your best articles ever. You should send it to every Senator and Representative in Congress and anyone running in 2008.
Comment by Pete on 2008-04-24
Your analysis of the oil situation was right on. That analysis of the coming price increases in Oil, gasoline and diesel cannot be avoided.\
A sound energy policy from Congress with emphasis on alternate energy, nuclear energy, and alternate power sources for vehicles will not change the coming oil problems but might change the negative inflationary pressures on our domestic economy. I would like to see you investigate and write about that.
Pete\
Churla Vista
Comment by Robert Spoley on 2008-04-25
Sir,
I have been a petroleum geologist for 42 years. Your article points out many of the unspoken faults about planning and politics in this country. "Long term planning is lunch". There is no long term planning in this country! and our worst enemy "is the idiot in the mirror". (see POGO).
Comment by Butchrgt on 2008-04-26
I believe that you just barely touched on the subject of reducing demand for fuel. Fear factor has a lot to do with what is going on with demand of fuel especially in the US. Mind Sets of people believing that they cannot make a difference on reducing oil demands is untrue. It is my personal opinion that if a gallon a day was saved by the consumer just for a million citizens it would be over 3 Billion Gallons saved, and that is in one day. Think of the fuel savings if everyone save more. The numbers of gallons would astound the average consumer. But it will work if EVERYONE gives it a try. Is this correct or not? Now if we can reduce demand by ensuring our vehicles are properly tuned, it will save gas right? Slowing down and reducing the speed saves gas right? Changing Oil Filters, Air Filters and Gas filters aids in the reducing gas consumption, right? Just keeping the tires properly inflated will reduce gas use, right? Or are all these also myths on gas saving tips that AAA has been feeding us for as long as I can remember? If they are true, and millions of Americans have been told they are true, why can't we save fuel if we follow good driving practices? It is my firm belief that if we reduce the National Speed Limit to 55MPH, and enforce the law we would save more fuel then a pipe dream can imagine. That was our National Speed limit a long time ago, so why can't the DOT and the US Law Makers pass a law to make this happen again? Look personally it doesn't matter much to me, but I am concerned for my children, and Grandchildren. If something isn't productively done and soon we will run out of fuel, and all will suffer a great many different ways a result of this dilemma. Everybody is well aware that the big cause of oil prices is due to the large demand that countries, like China, India, Russia and the middle East are the placing on the fuel demands as consumers because of their population. We in American MUST CURB this voracious appetite for fossil fuel, and learn to conserve.
Put teeth into the laws, by enforcement, and use motorized vehicles on a necessity basis. Use public transportation when ever possible and feasible. All these measures WILL help, and everyone has the opportunity to assist in their own small way.
Comment by on 2008-04-27
Butchrgt is correct on the point that we can still make some difference. Though we may not be able to stop the flood, we can do things to dampen the damage with our working towards reducing consumption. I found an idea on a website that would encourage behavioral driving change: www.gasbucket.com
Comment by Geoff Davis on 2008-04-29
It's interesting to note that, at $3.50 a gallon, that's still only around 90 cents a litre. Here in Australia, it's bumping up at $1.50 a litre, or $5.80 a US Gallon. When I lived in Canada in 2005, their prices were also substantially higher than the US and I believe they remain so.

Demand for gas/petrol is inelastic, but these high prices have certainly increased public transport use and gone some way to curbing rampant wastage. Maybe it's time Congress woke up and considered the long-term needs - that is, past the next election.

One of the problems is now that, to cut wastage and encourage more fuel-efficient initiatives, a long process of carrot (incentives) and stick (price increases) policy must be pursued. The upside is that price increases via taxes obviously generate revenue for the government, which can be used to fund better public transport and development of alternatives to private car use and all the other applications of oil generally.

We're bad enough over in Oz. I can only imagine the adjustment the average American will have to go through, both personally and economically.
Comment by BB on 2008-05-04
The oil price was fine just before the invasion of Iraq. Just as Iraq was starting to produce in huge quantities again the US thought they would benefit from these productions by invading it. Why should I believe that a five fold increase in the price of crude has anything to do with so much smaller increases in demand? Why should I believe that peak oil has this tremendous impact on prices in such a short term while the end of oil is so much further away? You just told us the saudi king is still thinking about his children (and probably his or here children). What will be your theories when the prices will start to drop to just above 2001 market levels?
Comment by MarkinMemorial on 2008-10-28
Is the recent drop in gas prices a blip, or is the reduction here to stay? Certainly prices will rise, they always will, but will the current low prices be the starting point, with rates of increase more in-line with pre-2004 rates of increase, or will gas pop back up to what they were just a few months ago, and/or will we see the sharper faster rate of increase we have gotten used to the past 4 years?