Rate:
Share
Views: 3206
Text Size:

Domestic Crude Oil Production

Last Chance to Save U.S. Oil Production

By Keith Kohl
Tuesday, August 26th, 2008

It's only a matter of time.

That was my answer the last time I was asked whether the ban on offshore drilling would be lifted. Granted, crude prices at the time were moving past $140 per barrel. We all know what came next. Prices dropped sharply, as low as $112.88 per barrel last week.

This morning, I was asked the same question. Since oil prices are no longer in record territory, has my answer changed?

Not a chance.

Can you blame me? Just take a look at the hole we've dug for ourselves. On a global scale, fossil fuels still make up approximately 86% of the world's energy supply. Although U.S. demand has fallen off recently, the fact is we still consume roughly one quarter of the world's 85 million barrels/day production.

Our massive thirst for oil, however, isn't the scary part.

According to the EIA, the U.S. imported about 10 million barrels of crude oil per day in June. Even though Canada is still our single largest source for crude oil, over 55% of our crude imports were from OPEC.

Naturally, OPEC's interest is in higher oil prices. That makes perfect sense, considering the oil cartel controls about 40% of the world's oil production. I also wouldn't count on the organization to sit idle, twiddling their thumbs. When OPEC gets together in Vienna on September 9, the group only has two options: either maintain or cut current production.

If we listen to OPEC's numbers, the oil markets are oversupplied by a million barrels per day. In order to defend higher oil prices, OPEC hawks have already started to call for a cut in production.

Reducing foreign oil imports is no longer a question for the U.S., it's a necessity.

In other words, the U.S. will be looking to boost its domestic oil production.

Opening Up Domestic Crude Oil Production

Unfortunately, there's no quick fix to the problem.

The last time we talked about drilling ANWR, the question wasn't whether it would ever become open for drillers. We know it will, eventually. The problem, however, is the amount of time it will take producers to reach a significant amount of production.

The Energy Information Administration has reported the U.S. won't see production until 2018. Even then, production would reach a peak of only 780,000 barrels per day in 2027.

Over the last few months, people have been in the dark as to why it would take such a long time to see ANWR production. In fact, I've been told that ANWR oil could be flowing within two years.

Here's how the EIA breaks down the production timeline in their Analysis of Crude Oil Production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge:

  • 2 to 3 years to obtain leases, including the development of a U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) leasing program, which includes approval of an Environmental Impact Statement, the collection and analysis of seismic data, and the auction and award of leases.

  • Another 2 to 3 years to drill a single exploratory well. Exploratory wells are slower to drill because geophysical data are collected during drilling, e.g., rock cores and well logs. Typically, Alaska North Slope exploration wells take two full winter seasons to reach the desired depth.

  • 1 to 2 years to develop a production development plan and obtain BLM approval for that plan, if a commercial reservoir is discovered. Considerably more time could be required if the discovered oil reservoir is very deep, is filled with heavy oil, or is highly faulted. The petroleum company might have to collect more seismic data or drill delineation wells to confirm that the deposit is commercial.

  • Finally, 3 to 4 years to construct the feeder pipelines; to fabricate oil separation and treatment plants, and transport them up from the lower-48 States to the North Slope by ocean barge; construct drilling pads; drill to depth; and complete the wells.

That 10-year timeline wouldn't even begin until the Congressional ban is lifted. As you can see, the idea of seeing production in two years is not only unlikely, it's laughable.

We can see the same problem with the latest push to open up the Outer Continental Shelf.

Although it would it will take years for initial production, we're told that opening the OCS would mean an immediate relief for gasoline prices. Sadly, that's not the case since production from offshore drilling would only make up 1.4% of our demand in 2025.

Drilling in both these areas will happen, whether we like it or not. Until the restrictions are lifted, however, there are much better opportunities to focus on. Next week, I'll show you one of the few places where domestic oil production is actually growing.

Until next time,

 

keith kohl

Keith Kohl

P.S. Just because a company is located in a hot play doesn't automatically make it a winner. In fact, one of the fundamental parts of a drilling company is its production. Many of my Energy and Capital readers are playing one of the most active drillers in the Bakken right now. If you're interested in joining them, feel free to check out the $20 Trillion Report.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (11 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Dominic Scott on 2008-08-27
Dear Keith, this article fails to take into account Global Warming and Peak Oil. These are the biggest threats to our fossil fuel based society.
The US needs to start conserving oil use and being the biggest global consumer of fossil fuels should lead the way. We can stay with business as usual while pathologically destroying our natural support systems resulting in our collective self destruction or be the generation that changes direction and progresses to a just and sustainable world ushering in a new human era. Our generation is the last generation that has this opportunity to make this choice and our decision will effect all life on earth for all generations to come.
You look forward to 2018 but if we simply ramp up production and keep fossil fuel subsidies in place, not enough will be invested in the renewable energy sector or in new conservation technologies.You also say this drilling will happen whether we like it or not.
We have the technologies and the resources to swiftly switch over to a clean energy economy.
You would loose out on oil commissions but gain in ethical and profitable ones.
Drilling will only happen because of our myopic greed and sloth.
You have a lot of influence please keep this in mind as you dispense your advice.

Thank you for your time.

Comment by Paul Killinger on 2008-08-27
No, what's TRULY LAUGHABLE is our regulatory regime, which was designed NOT to mine U.S. energy.

We built the entire Prudhoe Bay complex and Trans-Alaskan pipeline and had oil flowing in only THREE YEARS.

We're not just shooting ourselves in the foot, we're shooting ourselves in the head! We need to reform this "bureaucracy gone wild" mentality before we all go broke!

And the answer's actually simple.
Simply GO BACK to the regulatory timelines we were using then, and make Congress and the bureaucrats fit all their new nonsense into those former timeframes.

This is of equal or greater importance than ending all the moratoria and exploratrion bans!
What good does the energy do you if you can only sit and look at it?


Comment by Dennis Nuzum on 2008-08-27
You seem to not factor in an intangible such as the effect on prices once the commitment to increase domestic supplies is ACTUALLY made. Remember when Pres Bush announced a lifting of the executive order from Clinton banning OCS drilling? The price of crude has fallen over 21%. This is analogous to having a heavy destroyer patrolling the coast...the fact it exists is in and of itself a deterrent. We need to make the COMMITMENT to increase drilling and production NOW!!!
Comment by DICK CAMMACK on 2008-08-27
SINCE OIL IS BOUGHT AND SOLD AS A
COMMODITY ON THE WORLD MARKET IT
DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO THINK THAT
AMERICA WILL CONTROL ITS OIL FUTURE BY DRILLING IN AMERICA.
THE OIL COMPANIES WILL SELL TO WHOEVER PAYS THE PROPER PRICE.SO
THAT DRILLING AND OBTAINING OIL IN
AMERICA WILL ONLY PUT MORE OIL IN THE "OIL PIE" FOR OTHER COUNTRIES TO EAT?
Comment by Butchrgt on 2008-08-27
Chris, according to your asessment of the crude situation we will not receive any benefit from new drilling locations for more than 10 years. If this accurate, and not simply a guessestimate then the only answer for the American People is the production of alternate power sources. This is the only way to eleviate the demand for crude as a primary source. With the events taking place by T. Boone Pickens, for wind and solar power along with new construction of Power Plants for production seems to be the best route to take a look at. Even
Water Power will be an assest to the American People to reduce the need for crude. Additionally with the demand dropping by the American
Consumer has made the drivers aware
that demand must drop or the prices
at the pumps will continue to rise.
It took a lot of educating and a rude of awakening for the consumer to finally see the light, but the trend has been set. The Dinosauers of V-8, Hummers, and SUV's is on a stron decline. Furthermore the Big Three Automakers are racing to build smaller and more economic fuel efficient vehicles. Toyota is also gearing towards manufaturing the smaller vehicles since Honda is a step ahead of all the manufactures. American Car builders
are way behind the Foreign makers and have a heck of a job to play ketchup. It is not too late for GMAC, Ford and Chrysler but they have a lot of work ahead of them.
Comment by Chuck S on 2008-08-27
It sounds like 7 of the 10 years is bureaucracy, since Paul said that it onl;y took 3 years to get oil from Prudhome bay/ Advocates of drilling want to streamline the bureaucracy. I suspect that opponents may try to add so much bureaucracy that it will take an extra 10 or 30 years to get any oil. Maybe peak oil was when bureaucracy got bad enough to reduce production. I heard that it would only take 1 year to get oil from off the California coast because the area is shallow and has already been explored.
Paul said that we could go back to the regulations of years ago. Maybe we could go farther, since the equipment has gotten much better.
Dick, the US is buying $700 bilion in oil from other countries. Even if we sold any new production to other countries, wouldn't it be better to have $50 or $150 billion coming in the same time we have the $700 billion going out? Besides, it's a world market and more oil going anywhere would lower the price worldwide, so we'd be paying less than $700 bill out. However, world demand keeps going up and existing oilfields keep depleting, so more porduction may just slow price increases. We mayh have world demand 100 million barrels/day and supply 98, similar to now. If we don't start drilling soon, world supply may only be 95 milion barrels/day, making for much higher prices than now.
Some side notes: I'm a bit nervous about giving my name in a public forum, so maybe you should have an option to use a screen name. Also, at the bottom of your article it says "comment on this article." Perhaps it should mention that a person could browse comments without having to leave one. Maybe they wouldn't have to leave their name if they are just looking.
Comment by Robert Moore on 2008-08-28
All fees and interest collected by all lenders above eight percent effective annual percentage rate should be taxed at a rate of one hundred percent. Individuals should be able to deduct one hundred percent of interest payments from their taxable income...we used to have this deduction and we need it now more than ever. And finally, to be a financial institution of any kind you must offer passbook savings accounts with a minimum interest rate of four per cent. Since banks can lend two dollars for every one dollar on deposit, their margin will be eight per cent. The government will have all the income they need for any programs they want plus debt retirement and individuals will not be paying taxes on money they do not get to keep. And paying for gasoline and medical care and saving for college, rainy days, and retirement will once again be possible without any other adjustments to the economy. Lenders have gone over the top with usuary rates and the need to be punished...this will do it.
Comment by Derek C on 2008-09-12
My stepfather is the owner / operator of several crude oil wells which produce the equivalent of about 5000 barrels of crude oil per month. And this crude oil has been tested above 90% pure multiple times. Tell me why there is not a refinery in the country that will accept his oil which is marked at about 80% of the price of foreign crude oil. He manages to sell about 1000 barrels every two months, at all other times he receives the simple response "We don't need it" from whomever he contacts. Sure, you may not "need" it, but why don't you "want" it? And this is not a single occurrance. Many of the oil well proprietors in the same area are turned down for their pure crude oil, even though it is marked down in price versus foreign oil. The United States refining companies do not want domestic oil.
Comment by R. Lane Burgess on 2008-10-08
I enjoyed reading the comments on your site.
Referencing Derek C. on the 5,000 bbls. of oil produced per month. I would like to know his father in law's U.S. area of production, crude analysis and contact information.

I may be able to help.

Derek I may be reached at Lane@BurgessEnergy.com