It was a simple comment sent to me last week that wouldn't leave my mind.
Normally, I can brush aside inane ramblings that are devoid of proof or reasonable logic. But the reason I was so fired up wasn't because it was directed at me.
It was directed at you.
In a nutshell, the individual scoffed at the peak oil concept. His reasoning came down to the fact that global reserves have increased every few years, thus peak oil is a farce. For starters, I don't think I need to explain to my readers that peak oil isn't about how much total oil is left under the ground, but rather the rate at which we can produce that oil.
I'll get back to his comment in just a minute.
The IEA's Oil Report
As you know, the highly anticipated World Energy Outlook report was released last week.
The IEA's oil report paints a sobering picture for future oil supply. Quite frankly, some of the numbers are downright frightful. Finding 64 million barrels per day of new capacity between now and 2030 will be a monumental task for producers, no matter how rosy your personal outlook is for supply.
It's difficult not to see a monumental shift in energy is approaching. Just take a look at the report's oil field decline statistics. Over one-quarter of the world's oil production comes from just 20 super giant oil fields. Some of those fields have been producing for more than five decades.
The Saudis are pumping so much water into Ghawar now, I'm surprised more people don't mistake the field for the world's largest wishing well.
When Ghawar suffers the same fate as Cantarell, perhaps more people will take notice. I can't help think of how Cantarell's fate will affect us. Production at Cantarell has drastically plummeted. Cantarell is only projected to produce 700,000 barrels per day in 2009 (the field topped over 2 million barrels per day just four years ago).
If you think the loss of Cantarell isn't a big deal, I'd suggest selling your car. Unless Mexico can successfully boost production, the country may be forced to cut all exports as early as 2012. That will have serious repercussions for us considering 11% of our oil imports come from Mexico (our 3rd largest importer).
The Most Profitable Energy Transition The World Has Ever Seen!
On November 12, 2008, the International Energy Agency (IEA) officially confirmed that every fossil fuel resource we rely on today will simply not be able to keep pace with demand.
As a result, the IEA stated in very clear terms that renewable energy will soon become the second largest source of energy.
Want to know which renewable energy source will take the lion's share of tomorrow's power generation?
Click here, and see where the experts are putting their money!
One caveat, however, is in the data used to generate the report. According to the IEA, some of their data is based on future projects or from outside sources. In other words, the IEA has to trust the countries aren't fudging the numbers.
Then again, we know the kind of fudging that OPEC is capable of.
My long-time readers know exactly what I'm talking about. In fact, it's the same chart I sent over to the gentleman who sent in the earlier comment. Notice how OPEC countries more than doubled their reserves in such a small time frame.
I've said it before, and today will not be any different...
Shenanigans!
Investing in Our Future Oil Supply
For the sake of going off on a tangent, I'll try not to harp on their reserve inconsistencies.
I've been accused of many things in the past, but looking ahead isn't one of them. I've been inundated with questions about energy stocks as a whole. Clearly, if you don't realize the magnitude of energy's role in our society, perhaps it's best you sit this bear market out.
One part of the IEA report specifically caught my eye, and despite the possible conflict with data, I can't help but agree with Mr. Birol and company.
While the giant oil fields continue to decline, the world will find its oil supply from smaller offshore oil fields.
Investors have two questions to answer:
Where can you find the right stocks?
When is the proper time to strike?
The answer to the latter is immediately.
In today's market, I haven't met a single investor that believes stocks are overpriced. You don't need me to tell you that there are a ton of quality stocks out there for dirt cheap prices.
Energy stocks in particular have taken a beating since July when oil prices topped $147 per barrel. Driving them down, as usual, are the same panicky investors who are always in trouble when the dust settles. They can't help buying high and selling low. Their fretful mind causes them to dump shares when they should be buying.
The second question is understandably more difficult for you to answer.
Personally, I would feel remiss if I didn't show you a place to find those investments. It simply wouldn't be fair for my newer readers. Finding those energy plays is exactly what the $20 Trillion Report was designed for.
Maybe it's time you joined your fellow Energy and Capital readers.
Until next time,
Keith Kohl
Subscribe to
Although I agree with you, there is always a nagging thought that the OPEC countries could have been justified in doubling and trebling their reserves as indicated in the table. After all reserves change every day and every minute of every day according to the oil price and exchange rate. Maybe the jump in reserves figures merely reflects an underestimate in previous years. Maybe the countries saw no need to update their reserves figures at that time for whatever reason and that is why they are all pretty static for the years preceding the sudden jump.
Just a thought.
I love your newsletters.
regards
Dave
your article this morning is only superseeded by our beautful Blue Sky and bright Sunny morning. Your state residence Arazona, I read is one of only four states in this lame duck burning bush administration that are reported to be do-ing well financially, when compared to all the other states. Oil stocks do go up and down like the weather, even Greed cannot control the supply and demand of all petrochemical production. Are you living too far away from the Old manufacturing base states when manufacturing was king and cheep oil was the rule of the land? There is no New Era of New Energy just more of the same. In upstate N.Y., people are going back to wood furnices, paying over $300.00 a cord to heat there homes everywhere, where no-none Gas lines exist. Most all of the top 100 companies in New York are now service oriented industries, with just one company, Corning Glass still manufacturing in the top 100, with a Raw Materials base.
Services cannot beget Services,and Like two Homosexials, they can't biologicially produce children. So
for a short while less and less of the people and businesses, paid more and more for those petrochemical distilants to power their cars and businesses then, because of NAFTA,GATT, FTA, FTAA etc., etc., US trade agreements you know, the companies laid off all of the working people and closed the manufacturing plants which has created excess oil and gas supplies hence, the price of crude has gone Down, Down, Down.How low will it go? In our part of the US, A crisis of monumental proportions has existed for years, people no longer working, don't pay taxes after the Unemployment checks run out, they become welfare recipients and now collect money and hospitalization bebefits from the Government.I'm afraid the little people who once paid all the government bills are completely tapped out of money and ideas as to where to even find a job. I haven't even seen or heard of a Revolution brewing, Can the News speak really control the minds and hearts of everyone? President elect Barack Obama spoke of change but, as time goes on he appears to be going "Business as Usual" policies of the past 20 year
When you expand oil reserves to include "probable" then reserves expand dramatically. Peak theory fails at this point.
KofSA has not invested in expanding their fields to any great extent. Transparency is not in their vocabulary. I know, I have been there. Their "probable" gas and heavy oil reserves is incredible. Peak theory fails again.
As price rises, ingenuity rises. Malthus didnt understand this concept, neither do Peak Theorists.
Failed again..