Developing the Tupi Oil Field

Petrobras's Offshore Gamble

By
Monday, April 27th, 2009

Judging from the amount of responses I read last week, it's fair to say my readers can be very opinionated.

As you remember, the federal court of appeals yanked the DOI's five-year oil and natural gas leasing plan right from underneath its feet. And truth be told, the last time I saw that kind of animosity was when I sat next next to a group of Yankee fans at Fenway Park.

But just two days after the replies came flooding in, I came across another news release. Right on the heels of the court decision, Florida lawmakers gave the green light to lift the state's ban on drilling off their coast. Furthermore, the house gave the governor and his cabinet power to approve drilling proposals between 3 and 10 miles offshore.

The sudden interest in developing Florida's offshore oil and gas comes with the hope of millions in revenue for the state budget. Naturally, the bill is being lobbied and funded by an unidentified group.

I'm curious as to how many of you are supporting this kind of move. The image of oil platforms dotting the horizon comes to mind. You can leave your thoughts by clicking on the comments section below. Although I never want my readers to pull any punches, just try to keep the commentary publishable (also make sure your caps lock button isn't stuck).

Oil Afloat at $50

If you've been following oil prices closely today, you've probably noticed the $50/bbl mark has been teasing us all morning. After dropping as low as $48.01 per barrel during trading earlier, prices finally found their footing.

According to the media, the latest swine-flu outbreak is the reason for falling crude prices. Their train of thought is that the swine-flu is causing a panic and limiting air travel, thus curbing jet fuel demand and the world economy.

One gentleman in particular told me this single event will flush oil prices back down into the $30 price range.

Personally, I'm not buying it.

For starters, crude oil has nearly erased the losses from this morning's trading. The next test is whether prices can break $60 per barrel this time around. Over the last three weeks, oil bounced as high as $56.10 per barrel.

So if it's not the pig-flu frenzy in the media, what's keeping crude down?

The Energy Bull You Don't Want to Miss

Our analysts have traveled the world over, dedicated to finding the best and most profitable investments in the global energy markets. All you have to do to join our Energy and Capital investment community is sign up for the newsletter below. You'll also get our free report, Oil Outlook: Investing in 2011 by our resident energy expert, Keith Kohl.

Enter your email:
We never spam! View our Privacy Policy

Let's take a look at U.S. demand. After all, we are the undisputed leader in global oil consumption. And for the last seven consecutive weeks, the EIA has reported a build in inventory levels. Last week, U.S. crude oil stocks reached 370.6 million barrels. That comes out to an increase of 3.9 million barrels over the prior week. Furthermore, that's 54.5 million barrels higher than a year ago.

Needless to say, we're well above the five-year average. In fact, the last time our crude inventory was this high was on September 14, 1990 — nineteen years ago.

Meanwhile, OPEC has been unusually quiet lately. Members insist that $70 per barrel is where they'd like to see prices, but $50 per barrel is "reasonable." Does anyone else recognize this oil dance from before? When oil was at $35 per barrel, OPEC felt $50 was the correct price. I have a feeling that if oil prices were $70 a barrel right now, they would be pushing for $90 per barrel.

Remember, OPEC still hasn't reached the production cuts announced in 2008. And depending on whom you talk to, OPEC members have cut between 80-90% of the proposed cuts so far.

But not all the news I come across is bad. . .

Brazil's Tupi Success

The Tupi offshore field isn't new to us. I'm certain you've heard about this huge offshore discovery at least once over the last year. In fact, it's one of few areas with a bright production outlook. The field is expected to start pumping oil this Friday.

It's also opening up a door for investors.

Before I go any further, I think it's imperative you don't get roped-in from the wild numbers. I've seen some ridiculous production numbers associated with the Tupi field. The one that comes to mind immediately was in an email boasting that the Tupi field will satisfy the entire U.S. demand for the next decade.

First of all, I think my readers are intelligent enough to know the Tupi field won't be producing upwards of 20 million barrels per day this year. Or ever, for that matter. It simply won't happen.

However, we can expect some big action in Brazil. Last week, Petrobras announced the company will be looking for approximately 240 offshore vessels to help develop their offshore resources. We're talking about everything: drill ships, supply ships, storage vessels, etc.

Increasing their oil production will come at a cost. In this case, Petrobras is investing nearly $200 billion with the target of increasing production by 700,000 barrels per day over the next four years.

Since contracts could begin as early as May, there's still a chance for investors to get a piece of the action. Petrobras expects to almost double their number of offshore rigs in the next two years. Next week, I'll tell you which one of those offshore drillers I'm picking up before those contracts come out.

Until next time,

keith kohl

Keith Kohl

Energy and Capital


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (19 votes)




Comments:

Comment by Jeremy on 2009-04-27
I don't mind them drilling off the coast of Florida, so long as we don't allow absolutely every place to be drilled right now. It would be nice to save some of that oil for future generations instead of hogging it all for ourselves! Also, since the oil companies are pushing to open up off shore drilling, I think there should be clauses holding them specifically responsible for any damages done from the oil spills that are sure to follow. Oil spills could be especially damaging to the tourism industry off the coast of Florida.
Comment by Dr Robt S Poston, PhD on 2009-04-27
The first offshore oil well was drilled in 1938 in West Camerion, La by Superior Oil about 1,000 ft from the beach. Tex, La & Miss permit offshore drilling in state waters. It is very safe and clean. There is now 4,000 platforms producing offshore fed waters. Total spills in 30+ yrs is less than 1,000BO. So GO FOR IT!!
Comment by Derek Blair on 2009-04-27
During your synopsis, you omitted the stock symbol for Petrobras. Please include whenever you refer to a company; it obviates the need to scan the pages of the WSJ.
Many thaks for your always admiral
(should that be hyphenated? Always-admiral?) analyses.
Comment by Lynda Allen on 2009-04-27
I lived in Florida for a decade and one of the nicest things about Florida is it's shorelines and little or no dirty industry in the state...too bad about selling all this out for oil money. I wonder what the magnificent sunsets will look like once this happens? Get the state hooked on oil & then when a hurricane hits it will create a panic situatuon. Shouldn't the Sunshine State look to solar instead?
Comment by Paul Eckerson on 2009-04-27
The one thing no one talks about is the issue of possible oil spills. You remark no one likes to look at them but the truth be told it is the possibility of spills. I'd want any company drilling wells offshore to have insurance to cover any and all cleanup from spills from their operations. I have to have insurance to drive my car and the cost is appropriate with the risk. Time for all players to play by the same rules.
Comment by Lanning E. Likes on 2009-04-27
Significant technological improvements have been developed during the last 15 years. Off Shore Drilling can be accomplished in a safe way - providing environmental protection. To ignore the advances and the U.S. need for more secure energy sources is incompetent policy and mind set. With alternative energy advancements now moving forward we can begin to have the best of both Worlds. The U.S. will need conventional Oil/Gas resources for many years - if nothing more than to allow for energy production and use transformation. LEL
Comment by Sanjiv on 2009-04-27
I agree that oil cannot stay $50 for long. I am in the engineering and construction industry and have seen major projects put on hold or cancelled. Currently cost of production especially in deepwater is more than the selling price!
The longer this low oil price last, the worse will be the peak price when everything turns around again ($147 we saw earlier will look like nothing!).
Comment by Scott Lamb on 2009-04-27
Oil is now a finite fuel with three significant significant forces shaping its end - 1.cost control, 2.pollution elimination 3. national security. The past oil/price spike has unleashed these three policy & commercial drivers within in the USA (and the modern industrialized world). The USA, as the world's consumer leader, will force the globe to follow its oil elimination policies. Oil has a steadily declining 15 year horizon as a significant energy commodity, we will not see $/barrel pricing move beyond $75US.
Comment by Dallas1 on 2009-04-28
While I'm now back in Dallas, I spent three years living three blocks from the beach in Long Beach. Oil wells were clearly visible about 1/4 mile offshore (though California has done a terrific job of requiring them to be cleverly disguised).

I can assure Floridians that if their new wells are no closer than three miles offshore, they'll never notice. And the track record on accidental spills off of U.S. coasts is so good that anyone worried about it should take a chill pill.
Comment by Scot Tygart on 2009-04-28
It is every important that we develop confidence in our resource recovery... and the only real way that will happen is if this administration simply cuts Venuzaulian oil off and our oil company's be allowed to increase recovery of oil. North Dakota alone could fuel this country for the next 50 years... yet drilling has come to a near stop!
Comment by Ivan Hills on 2009-04-28
Good for Florida. I spend about ten winter weeks there and enjoy sea-swimming on both coasts. I'll also be happy to sit in a beach-chair and watch oil-rigs through my binoculars. They are more interesting than windmills. I would be happy to sail my Maine based 30 footer round oil and gas rigs on Penobscot Bay.
Comment by David on 2009-04-28
Drilling for oil in this country is about the only idea I agreed with in regard to that babe from Alaska(McCain's running mate). We all know what a tax imported oil is and the fact it supplies the terrorists with funds;therefore lets make friends with Cuba; finish drilling the gulf and the coasts and in the process work toward sustainable energy such as solar and wind and geothermal. I feel the oil push here needs to be priority one with the idea of sooner than later weaning ourselves away from fossil fuels. We need a grass roots movement for this country to develop a really good energy policy and companies such as xom should by tax incentives be pushed to develop sustainable alternative energy(if they do not do it they will eventually not exist).
Comment by Jon in Fla on 2009-04-28
It will be a huge mistake to allow drilling near shore in fla. The tourism industry is one of the largest industries in the state. The reason that we have this successful industry is the beautiful beaches that we have, especially along the Fla gulf coast. Imagine what one oil spill will do to the beaches and the ecosystem that it supports. The amount of oil that can be pumped from coastal drilling in Fla is only a small percentage of what we need to really make a difference. The correct course of action is to put that money toward research in alternative and renewable energy sources. Its past time that we strive toward becoming less dependent on oil instead of trying to drill and find more of it; endangering our ecology and coastal industries in the process.
Comment by Lynne on 2009-04-28
NO to offshore drilling in Florida. This is wrong on too many levels to even write about. The US needs to go after renewable energy sources in an concentrated way and not pour a lot of money into outdated systems that will not save us from diaster when the world runs out of oil. Wake up America!
Comment by Ron Kirkpatrick on 2009-04-28
I strongly support both drilling and windmills in appropriate locations offshore. The kicker is 'appropriate.' I think 3 miles should be the minimum distance offshore to limit visual pollution. For oil, platform density could be fairly thin--not more than one per square mile and perhaps much greater spacing. Slant and horizontal drilling technology has advanced to the point that this is not a significant constraint.

I believe that the primary problem in improving our domestic energy supply has been the ease of blocking energy development through interminable litigation. This must be solved at the federal level.
Comment by colin on 2009-04-28
Oh, well. I suppose it's just another technological thing that we've introduced into our lives and will have to accept. Like those unsightly electric and telephone wires. Like windmills. Like factories. Like all of it.

Humans clutter up the place. All of us. The solution is of course to grow thoughtfully and carefully, but who's got the time for that?

I would have written a shorter comment, but I didn't have the time.

CSC
Comment by dan on 2009-04-28
here in texas we have an offshore oil industry. the rigs can rarely be seen from the beach and below the surface they are TEEMING with life. corals, sponges,mollusks and massive schools of fish. most of the commercial red snapper in this country come from lousiana which has even more platforms than texas. the rec. fishing sector is a huge industry. almost all oil spills are a result of transportation, not production. oil here is transported in pipelines, not ships, much safer.
Comment by Dorv on 2009-04-28
For the most part, everything plastic, everything synthetic, comes from hydrocarbons extracted from crude oil. Important things like food production, clothing and medicine. And there is much more profit in hydrocarbons than in gasoline. We will always need to produce crude. The purpose of the environmental movement is to control American business first, last and always. That this movement generates such emotional attachment toward our landscape is an indication of how successful this movement has been in misdirecting its purpose. We will starve to death while watching a sunset! Our government today chooses to extend its control over our lives through endless regulations rather than provide the energy free people require to make life more comfortable. We need the safe, clean, cheap energy from nuclear power right now, like the rest of world wisely does now, to provide the electrical energy for stationary use and electrical transportation, and free up crude oil for applications better than simple burning. But our government in Washington wants its power, over us and our property, and makes things worse by restricting nuclear. Unleash nuclear and we will eventually be able to eliminate unsightly drilling. Remember, governments never solve problems, only exacerbate them.
Comment by Dorv on 2009-04-28
For the most part, everything plastic, everything synthetic, comes from hydrocarbons extracted from crude oil. Important things like food production, clothing and medicine. And there is much more profit in hydrocarbons than in gasoline. We will always need to produce crude. The purpose of the environmental movement is to control American business first, last and always. That this movement generates such emotional attachment toward our landscape is an indication of how successful this movement has been in misdirecting its purpose. We will starve to death while watching a sunset! Our government today chooses to extend its control over our lives through endless regulations rather than provide the energy free people require to make life more comfortable. We need the safe, clean, cheap energy from nuclear power right now, like the rest of world wisely does now, to provide the electrical energy for stationary use and electrical transportation, and free up crude oil for applications better than simple burning. But our government in Washington wants its power, over us and our property, and makes things worse by restricting nuclear. Unleash nuclear and we will eventually be able to eliminate unsightly drilling. Remember, governments never solve problems, only exacerbate them.
Comment by Bob Spoley on 2009-04-28
Dear Keith
A variety of "things" happen offshore. Fishing, sailing, shipping, spacecraft recovery, athletics, etc. Most of the afore noted are more detrimental to the offshore environment than drilling. Wait to you see mineral recovery or shellfish or dragnets! There about 195 countries in the world. About 20-30 are net-net self sufficient in oil. By finding and producing our own oil, world wide oil shipments will be reduced thus reducing the very real increase of oil spills from oil shipping and aiding lots of other countries with their needs for oil and its products. Now that is a stimulus plan!
Comment by Luis on 2009-04-28
Well I think it's good that Florida's offshore can be drilled for oil. However I ask: what is an approximate estimate of the cost for barrel of oil in this offshore area???
$15, $20, $30, $40, $50, more???
Comment by Phillip Greene on 2009-04-28
As a scuba diver in and around the Florida keys, I know that the Gulf stream is a powerful force. I hate to think about an oil spill there because the Gulf stream is very powerful and would carry any spill very quickly up along the entire east coast and eventually out across the Atlantic.

Drilling there won't produce any oil for several years and the amount is in question.

The elephant in the room that these commenters seem to forget is the pollution from our continued overuse of fossil fuels in this country. We need a new economy based on renewable clean energy.
Comment by Eddie Deerfield on 2009-04-28
I would rather see our own oil rigs drilling and producing oil rather than depend on foreign oil.
What I would really like to see is the Governors on the East Coast invest in the Wind Turbines to produce electricity.
We have got to start taking care of ourselves instead of depending on other countries because they can cut us off at anytime. I think it is a great idea.
Comment by lance on 2009-04-28
Hurray! The only place Democrats want to drill is in our wallets.. I love the sight of rigs off the Santa Barbara coast... they look like Victory over a bunch of evil doers selling us oil from the Mideast. Open up ANWAR and enjoy some 1.50 gas again!
Comment by William Bailey on 2009-04-28
Instead of getting hysterical about a few dozen, so far mild, cases of swine flu in the US, we should consider that each year thousands of people (albeit usually older individuals with compromised immune systems) die from ordinary flu and no one even notices.
Comment by George Hafer on 2009-04-28
Ahhh- "Florida Sweet Crude" music to my ears.
Comment by charlie on 2009-04-29
At this time in our economy, we are in a deflationary trend. Prices are falling due to slowing demand and wages will soon follow. Elementary. Prices will someday rise when the velocity of money/demand increases but not for now.
Comment by Mel Rollins on 2009-04-29
Most of the oil platforms will be too far off to be seen. I Long Beach, Calif. the ones close to shore are cleverly disguised with fake palms etc. and actually inprove the scenery. The one's off the Santa Barbara coast never seemed to present a problem. We have so much oil in our own country, it's criminal to keep buying it from our enemies. Wind and solar are nice but will never be able to do the job. Bakaan oil fields have more oil than Arabia, and the Canada oil sands can supply a lot, albiet at a higher cost. But at least it would keep the money onshore and provide needed employment. The environmental whakkos would reduce us to fourth world status to save such species as the field mouse, snail darter, polar bear, etc, all unneeded and unnecessary forms we can easily do without. Hawaii has no snakes, bears, mountain lions etc. and does just fine.


Comment by Wes on 2009-05-03
You afraid that oil will be discovered off of the beaches in Florida? Are you afraid that Brazil will destroy OPEC in the coming years?

Are you afraid that "Peak Oil" theory will be discredited............again.
Comment by Ray Morse on 2009-08-04
Right now I think we have a rally in a bear market. Do not expect a bottom until somewhere between say Oct. 2011 - Oct. 2012. Too many problems, debts, real estate, commercial real estate, more layoffs, people not spending, and our government. And even then I expect a slow recovery. You can buck the forces or go with the flow.
SHARE / RATE